Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Om Textile Factory Vs. Pepsico Inc
Decided On : Jul-11-2005
Court : Trademark
LAW: Section 20, Section 11, Section 9, Section 18(4, Section 11(2, Section 11, Section 18(1, Section 18(4, the Opposition No
CARDINAL: 1, 25, 1992.Eventually, 1, 193.2, 22.1.2004, 32, 18, 1.6.2004, 3.3.2005, one, one, 25, 2500
ORG: PEPSI, Trade Marks Journal, Opponent, PEPSI, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, PEPSI, Applicant, Applicant, PEPSI, PEPSI, PEPSI, PEPSI, PEPSI, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Supreme Court, PEPSI, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, PEPSI, Applicant, Applicant, Tribunal, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, Tribunal, Applicant
DATE: 687663, April, 25.8.2003, 417908, 417910, 1984, 11, the year 1990, the year 1956, the period of, 1975, 2003, the year May, 1990, 1999, the year 1992, 8, the year 1992, 1000 per year, 687663
PERSON: Applicant, Nos, Divya Balasundaram, Divya Balasundaram, Sundaram, Sundaram, Shri Godfrey, Godfrey, KOL-160895
GPE: India, India, India, India, India
PRODUCT: Act.4
WORK_OF_ART: Shri Om Prakash Rathi