Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Om Textile Factory Vs. Pepsico Inc

Decided On : Jul-11-2005

Court : Trademark

LAW: Section 20, Section 11, Section 9, Section 18(4, Section 11(2, Section 11, Section 18(1, Section 18(4, the Opposition No

CARDINAL: 1, 25, 1992.Eventually, 1, 193.2, 22.1.2004, 32, 18, 1.6.2004, 3.3.2005, one, one, 25, 2500

ORG: PEPSI, Trade Marks Journal, Opponent, PEPSI, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, PEPSI, Applicant, Applicant, PEPSI, PEPSI, PEPSI, PEPSI, PEPSI, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Supreme Court, PEPSI, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, PEPSI, Applicant, Applicant, Tribunal, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, Tribunal, Applicant

DATE: 687663, April, 25.8.2003, 417908, 417910, 1984, 11, the year 1990, the year 1956, the period of, 1975, 2003, the year May, 1990, 1999, the year 1992, 8, the year 1992, 1000 per year, 687663

PERSON: Applicant, Nos, Divya Balasundaram, Divya Balasundaram, Sundaram, Sundaram, Shri Godfrey, Godfrey, KOL-160895

GPE: India, India, India, India, India

PRODUCT: Act.4

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Om Prakash Rathi

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //