Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Tarachand Koyal Vs. Maheswar Choudhury

Decided On : May-11-1973

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 54, Chapter, the Indian Evidence Act, the Finance Act, Section 2(d, Section 137, Section 54, Section 137, Section 137, Section 137, Section 54, Section 137, section 32, the Finance Act, Section 6, section 6, Section 137, the Finance Act, Section 6, the Finance Act, Section 6(c, the General Clauses Act, Section 137, the Finance Act, Section 54, Section 137, Section 6(c, the General Clauses Act, Section 138(2, Section 138(2, Section 138(2, Section 137 of the Act of 1961, Section 138(2, Section 137, Section 137(1, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 54, Section 137, Section 32, the Finance Act, Section 138, the General Clauses Act, Section 6(c, the General Clauses Act, Section 54 of the 1922 Act, Section 137, Section 138, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure

ORG: R.N. Misra, the Orissa Sales Tax Act, the Central Government, the Official Gazette, Board, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, the Central Government, the Official Gazette, Board, the Madras High Court, the Delhi High Court, Ramakrishna Mudaliar, The Supreme Court, State of Punjab, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State of Punjab, the Supreme Court, State of Punjab, Chinnammal v. Kuwidhini, Daulat Ram v. Som Nath, the Delhi High Court, Ramakyishna Mudaliar, the applicability of Section 6, the Supreme Court, State of Punjab, theIncome, the Division Bench, Bench, Ramakrishna Mudaliar, Bench, the Delhi High Court, Bench

NORP: J.1, Indian, Indian, Indian, Punjab, Chinnammal, Chinnammal

DATE: years 1954-55 to 1964-65, 1922, 1872, 1872, 1964, April 1, 1922, the 1st day of April, I960, 1964, '138(1)(a, 1947, 1922, 1922, the 1st day of April, 1960, 1974, February 2, 1973, the accounting years 1964-65, April 1, 1964, 1961, years, 1964, 58, 1961, 1964, 1955, 1964, 1961, 1964, 1922, August 17, 1957, 1922, 1961, 19611 43 I.T.R. 83, 1961, '12, Section 138(1, 1961, 1961, 1966, 1968J 68, 1922, 1961, 1961, the 1st day of April, 1962, 1961, the 14thFebruary, 1957, 1964, 1966, 1967, 36, years 1954-55 to 1964-65

GPE: Act.3, case.10, A.I.R., S.C., Delhi, Ve

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 1964.5, 1, 6, 2, 94, 454, 3, two, one, two, 1965, 295, 296, 297, one, 1, 13, 61, 1965, 58, 0, 59, 64, two, two, quashed.20

EVENT: Section 137(1, S.C. 84

ORDINAL: first, first, first, secondly

PERSON: Digambar Bhuyan v., Nityananda Sahoo, Orissa, Digambar Bhuyan's, Misra, Sinha, Rajabu, Fathima Bukari, Mohar Singh, Sri Marar, Buhari Hotel, Chandra Kundu's, Mohar Singh, Mohar Singh, P. Ramaratnam, Sinha, P. Aggarwal, Mohar Singh, P. Aggarwal, Sinha, V. Sivagami Achi v. Vr, Ramanathan Chettiar, Sivagami Achi v. Vr, Fathima Bukari, Kumidhini, Veeraswami J., V. Sivagami Achi v. Vr, Ramanathan Chettiar, Sinha, Digambar Bhuyan's, Sinha

FAC: 288

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //