income-tax Officer, Ward-e Vs. Manmohanlal and ors.

Decided On : Dec-02-1987

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 226(4, Section 226(4, Section 156 of the Act, Section 226(4, Section 156, Section 226(4, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 156 of the Act, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 226(4, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 156 of the Act, Section 156 of the Act, Section 156 of the Act, Section 156 of the Act, Section 156 of the Act, Section 156 of the Act, Section 156 of the Act, Section 156 of the Act, No 1, Section 148, Section 63, Section 27, Section 63, Section 27, Section 63, Section 27, Section 282 of the Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 5 of the Code, Section 115 of the Code.14

PERSON: K.P. Mohapatra, Cuttack, Nos, R. C. Mohanty, S. C. Roy, Nos, Divan, Cuttack, Cuttack Bench, Mohanty, Divan, Mohanty, Nos, Mohanty, Roy, M. M. Lal, Khasav Ch, Panda, Kheshab Ch, Panda, Keshab Ch, Panda, Kesaba Ch, Panda, Keshab Ch, Panda, Nos, Nos, Nos, Mohanty, C.N. Nataraj v., Roy, Nos

NORP: J.1, Manmohanlal, Manmohanlal, Manmohanlal, Manmohanlal, Manmohanlal, Manmohanlal, Manmohanlal, Manmohanlal, Manmohanlal, Manmohanlal, Hindu, addressee

ORG: First Court, the Supreme Court, ITO, Appellate, the Supreme Court, Allied Dealers, Allied Dealers, Patnaik, Allied Dealers, Allied Dealers, Allied Dealers, Allied Dealers, Patnaik, Allied Dealers, Allied Dealers, Patnaik, Patnaik, Patnaik, ITO, CIT

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 3,08,533.10, 181, 2,99,413.50, 1,973, 3, 20,000, 20,000, 1987]168ITR616(SC, 617, 618, 1,973, 3, 1, 2, 3, 20,000, 128, 78, 3, 3, 3, 1,973, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1, 3, 16,827, 2, 3, 5,656, 3, 1, 1,270, 4, 1, one, 5, 1, 24-3-(sic, 6, 1, 3, 356, 1, 8), 2, 3, 23,777, 9, 2, 3, 3,290, 10, 2, one, 11, 2, 356, 12, 2, one, 13, three, three, 12, 1, 2, 3, two, two, 4, 5, 4, one, 1, 6, 1, 8, 2, 9 and 11, two, 10 and 12, one, 1, 2, 1965]56ITR250(KAR, 1955]28ITR684(Cal, 156, 282, 156, 282, 1, 5, 2, 13, 1, two, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 8, 1, 9, 19, 1, 9 to 19, 2, 2, 1,973

DATE: 1985, November 20, 1985, years 1962-63, 1963-64, the year 1962-63, the year 1963-64, the year 1962-63, November 13, 1986--ITO v., 1987, September 22, 1987, the year 1962-63, the year 1963-64, 1963-64, the earlier year, 1967-68, April 1, 1969, the later year, 1970-71, May 12, 1972, the year 1962-63, the year 1963-64, the year 1963-64, the year 1966-67, the year 1964-65, up to the year 1966-67, October 14, 1968, the assessment year 1964-65, October 30, 1970, the assessment year 1965-66, the assessment year 1965-66, August 5, 1971, 1965-66, November 12, 1970, the assessment year 1965-66, the assessment year 1966-67, the assessment year 1966-67, November 10, 1970, October 14, 1968, the assessment year 1963-64, October 30, 1970, the assessment year 1965-66, the assessment year 1965-66, November 12, 1970, October 30, 1970, the assessment year 1966-67, the assessment year 1966-67, November 11, 1970, the assessment years, the year 1964-65, the year 1965-66, the year 1965-66, the assessment year 1966-67, the year 1963-64, the years 1965-66, 1966-67, 1922, '282, 1908, 30 days, year 1962-63, the assessment year 1963-64

GPE: him.4, Manmohanlal, Manmohanlal, A.D., A.D., A.D., A.D., A.D.

WORK_OF_ART: Civil Appeal No. 2460

ORDINAL: first, Firstly, secondly

FAC: Keshab Chandra Panda