Gadadhar Dixit Vs. Utkal Flour Mills (Pvt.) Ltd.

Decided On : Apr-05-1988

Court : Orissa

LAW: the Indian Companies Act, the Indian Companies Act, the Company Act Case No. 11 of 1982, the Companies Act, Section 443(2, the Companies Act, Section 44(5, the Indian Partnership Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 433, the Companies Act, Section 433, the Companies Act, Section 433, Section 443(2, Section 433(f, Section 166 of the Companies Act, Section 167 of the Act, Section 166, Section 443(2, Section 433(f, Section 443(1)(d

ORG: P.C. Misra, Balasore, P.) Ltd., Nirmal Chandra Routray, Nirmal Chandra Routray, S.D.J.M., Smt, Smt, Dixit, Jagatpur, Lingaraj Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd., Sachikanta Routary, Utkal Roller, Utkal Flour Mills, P.) Ltd., Routray Group, Sharma Group, Utkal Roller, Hind Overseas Private Ltd., AIR 1976, SC, Needle Industries, Needle Industries Newey, Holdings Ltd., AIR 1981, AIR 1986, AIR 1955, SC, Lordships, Hind Overseas Private Ltd., SC, Lordships, the Supreme Court, Hind Overseas Private Ltd., the Supreme Court, Hind Overseas Private Ltd, SC, Utkal Roller, .regard, Utkal, Utkal Roller, Utkal Roller, the Central Government, the Central Government, Utkal Roller, AIR 1968, company.18, Reliance

CARDINAL: 1, seven, 1, 2, 3, 1,00,000, 15, 1,500, 1,000, 1,00,000, 1, 11%5, 10%7, 1, 2, 3, 50, 11,32,148.64, 3,43,202.96, 17,36,000, 11, 80,000, 1,11,000, three, 2., two, 11, 80,000, 80,000, 2., 3., 4., 5., 8, 9, 2, 2, 46, 91, 51, 743, 59, 548, 25, two, 46, five, 2, 3, 46, 91, 46, 3 and 4, 20 to 23, one, two, 17, 19

GPE: Charampa, Sharma, Sharma, Sharma

PERSON: Bhadrak, Ramakrishna Sharma, Durgadevi Sharma, Sachikanta Routray, Gadadhar Dixit, Bishnumohan Routray, Chandra Routray, Bhadrak, Sachikanta Routray, Gadadhar Dixit, Bishnumohan Routray, Sachikanta Routray, Gadadhar Dixit, Cuttack, Phula Devi Dixit, Berhampur, Bhadrak, Flour Mills', Flour Mills, litigation.3, follows:(a)Mrs, Shanti Routray2(d)Sri Beatahari, Bhawatidevi Routray1(g)Sri Kulamani Routray1(h)Sri Gourimohan, Sri Sachikant Routray, Flour Mills, Raghunath Prasad Jhunjhunwalla, Bacha F. Guzdar v. CIT, inter se ', Lordships, Lordships, Flour Mills, Flour Mills, Flour Mills, Flour Mills, Flour Mills, Flour Mills', Flour Mills', Nos, Mukherjee, Routray, Sachikanta Routray, Flour Mills, Flour Mills, Mukherjee, Gopal Krishnji Ketkar, Mohamed Haji Latif, Mukherjee, Mukherjee, Mukherjee

DATE: 1956, 1956, 4, 5, 6, 7, August 23, 1975, 3%3, 30%4, 4, 5, 1978, the year 1978-79, the year 1978-79, September 22, 1981, the year ending as on, June 30, 1980, that year, the year 1979-80, 1982, 1980, annual, the last four years, June, 1981, September 11, 1987, February 2, 1982, 1976, 1981, 1986, 1955, 1976, 1956, 1976, 1976, 1979, year, 1979, the month of July, 1981, the year 1981, the petitioner two years, September 22, 1981, September, 1981, the year 1979, July, 1981, June, 1981, September, 1981, the year 1979, annual, the year 1979-80 and 1981, September, 1981, day, annual, those years, each year, annual, more than 15 months, annual, annual, February 2, 1982, April 3, 1980, October 14, 1979, August 13, 1979, August 13, 1979, October 14, 1979, those days, the year 1979, February 13, 1984, 1413

NORP: Ramkrishna, Ramkrishna Sharma

PERCENT: 10%, nearly 28%, 30%

EVENT: SC 1298 and Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Escorts Ltd, SC 74

ORDINAL: first

LOC: petitioner.15