Bansidhar Patnaik and ors. Vs. Province of Orissa

Decided On : Sep-29-1950

Court : Orissa

LAW: Schedule 44, Schedule 88, Criminal Law Amendment Act, Section 195, Section 188, Schedule 45, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, Schedule 9, the Arms Act, Schedule 00, Schedule 76, Section 270, Section 409, Schedule 77 A, Schedule 09, Schedule 97, Schedule 09, Schedule 74, Schedule 88

PERSON: Ray, Criminal P. C., Criminal P. C., Schedule 88, Criminal P. C., Schedule, Criminal P. C. inter, Magan Lal v. Emperor, A. I. R., Criminal P. C., Rameswar Marware, A. I. R., Schedule 00, I. P. C., Criminal P. C., Criminal P. C.'6, Sheo Ahir v. Emperor, A. I. R., Noor J., Hori Ram, A. I. R., L. J. 463, Schedule, Schedule 09.9, George Rankin C. J., I. C. 432, Satis Chandra v. Ram Dayel De, C. L. J. 94, Exclude Schedule, Schedule, J.13

ORG: Court, Magistrate, Schedule 95, Advocate-General, State, Schedule 0, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the District Magistrate, State, Court, Guru Prasad Ram Gupta v., the Calcutta High Court, Court, Legislature, Court, Court, Court, Schedule 95, Patna, Rowland J. held:'If, Court, Court, the Federal Court, Singh v. Emperor, Sections, Government of India Act, Sanction of the Government, the Federal Court, Lordships, the High Court, Lordships, Ibrahim v. Emperor, Schedule, Criminal P. C.'In, the Calcutta High Court, Sections 211

CARDINAL: 145, 188, two, 88, 95, two, 35, 1100, 95, 95, one, one, 25, 527, 39, 8), 1, 22, 25, 548, 40, one, 40, 477A, two, 111, 22, 499, 88, one

NORP: so.2, Satish

ORDINAL: Secondly

DATE: 1932, 21) 1934 Nag, 1938, 26) 1939, 1935, 76, '10

GPE: thi3, Narasimham

PRODUCT: Schedule 45