Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rao and Sons Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax

Decided On : Dec-05-1964

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 66(1, Section 26A, the Income Tax Act, Section 26A, Rule 6, Section 26A of the Act, Section 59 of the Act the Central Board of Revenue, Section 23 of the Act, Section 26A of the Act, Rule 5, Rule 4, Rule 6, Section 26A, Section 26A, Article 26A, Section 26A, Section 26A, Section 26A, Section 26A of the Act, Section 23 of the Act, Section 26A

NORP: J.1, Indian, Rules, Indian, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules

DATE: 1922, the assessment year 1959-60, 1922, year 1958-59, the assessment year 1959-60, the relevant year, 28-7-1960, the assessment year 1958-59, the assessment year 1958-59, the assessment year 1959-60, 1922, any year, the previous year, the previous years, that previous year, any subsequent year, the assessment year 1958-59, the year 1959-60, the previous year, the end of each year, the end of each year, the end of the year, the previous year, 1959, the particular year, the previous year, the assessment year 1959-60, the assessment year 1959-60, 1922

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, M. SubbaRao, Firm, Appellate, Tribunal, Profit, Department, TheIncome, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Patna High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Instrument of Partnership, Tribunal, Firm, the Instrument of Partnership, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Sivakashi Match Exporting Co., Lordships, the Instrument of Partnership, the Patna High Court, Appellate Tribunal, Lordships, the High Courts of, Andhra Pradesh, The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Tribunal, The Bombay High Court, Income Tax Bombay, S.S.K. Haja Allauddln Maracair, Tribunal, Lordships, Tribunal, Department, Department, Department, Department, the Supreme Court, R.C. Mitter, Sons, Lordships, Instrument, Tribunal, Tribunal, Firm, the Instrument of partnership, Department

CARDINAL: 28-3-1958, five, 1, Four, 2, Four, 3, Four, 4, Two, 5, Two, three, 16, 3., 4, 18-6-61, 5., three, 20,483/-, 10,242, five, 1962]46ITR203(Patna, 6., 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3)of, 6, 5, 9, 8), 8), three, 8, 1964]53ITR204(SC, two, 1, 2, 9, 10, 1959]36ITR453(AP, 11, 1952]22ITR305(Bom, 12, 1952]22ITR545(Mad, 13, 14, five, 1, 2, 3, 5, 4, 4, two hundred and fifty

PERSON: Venkataswar Rao, Chandra Rao, M. Subba Rao, Sita Devi, Cuttack on14-3-59, Cuttack, 81,933/-, Sahabuddin Mohammad Raza v. Commr, 81,933/-, Narasaraju, Madras, Hyderabed, Atma Ram Bhogi Lal v. Commr, Madras, D. Mohanty, Mohanty

ORDINAL: first

MONEY: six per cent

GPE: Commr, Bombay, Narasimham

LOC: Madras

FAC: Grand Hotel

PRODUCT: 868

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //