Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Anem Shiva Parvatamma Vs. Akasam Bayanna

Decided On : Nov-14-1952

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 17, Section 17, Section 7, Section 17, Section 17(2, Section 17, Roe J., Section 17, Section 17

ORG: ORDERPanigrahi, State, Durga Prasad', the Patna High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, the Patna High Court, Court, Court, the State Legislatures, the Central Provinces & Berar Act 9 of, the United Provinces Act 19, the Legislatures of these States, Court, the Orissa State Legislature, Court, AIR, the Patna High Court, Registrar, Government Advocate, the Patna High Court, Court, Subordinate

CARDINAL: 1, 15, 1, 21, 30,000/-, 1864/1/0, 30,000/-, 3, two, two, 4, 195, two, One, one, more than one, 44, one, two, two, 28, one, two

PERSON: Berhampur, Civil P. C., Order, Kishori Lal Roy v., Sharat Chunder', Nouratanlal, Wilford, Joseph Stevenson', Ramdheyan, Rai, Pat, Dasarath

DATE: 1300/-, 1935, 1941, 1938, '44

WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate, Subordinate, 54 Mad 1

ORDINAL: first, first

PRODUCT: Manilal, a Full Bench, 8 Cal 593

GPE: valorem, India, Tunnilal, Shankerlal

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //