Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Anem Shiva Parvatamma Vs. Akasam Bayanna
Decided On : Nov-14-1952
Court : Orissa
LAW: Section 17, Section 17, Section 7, Section 17, Section 17(2, Section 17, Roe J., Section 17, Section 17
ORG: ORDERPanigrahi, State, Durga Prasad', the Patna High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, the Patna High Court, Court, Court, the State Legislatures, the Central Provinces & Berar Act 9 of, the United Provinces Act 19, the Legislatures of these States, Court, the Orissa State Legislature, Court, AIR, the Patna High Court, Registrar, Government Advocate, the Patna High Court, Court, Subordinate
CARDINAL: 1, 15, 1, 21, 30,000/-, 1864/1/0, 30,000/-, 3, two, two, 4, 195, two, One, one, more than one, 44, one, two, two, 28, one, two
PERSON: Berhampur, Civil P. C., Order, Kishori Lal Roy v., Sharat Chunder', Nouratanlal, Wilford, Joseph Stevenson', Ramdheyan, Rai, Pat, Dasarath
DATE: 1300/-, 1935, 1941, 1938, '44
WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate, Subordinate, 54 Mad 1
ORDINAL: first, first
PRODUCT: Manilal, a Full Bench, 8 Cal 593
GPE: valorem, India, Tunnilal, Shankerlal