Gmr Industries Ltd. Vs. Andhra Pradesh Electricity

Decided On : Mar-07-2007

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: the Article 2.5 of the Power Supply and Purchase Agreement, the Companies Act, Article 2.5, Article 2.5 of the PPA, Tariff applicable to High Tension Category-I Consumers, the Article 2.5 of the PPA, the Article 2.5 of the PPA, Article 2.5 of the PPA, Article 7 of the PPA, Section 21, Article 4.16, Article 2.5, Article 7:, Section 86(e, the Electricity Act 2003, Tariff for NCE-generators, Section 86(b, Section 86(1)(e, Section 61(h, Section 62(3, Section 45(4, Article 2.5 of the PPA, the Electricity Act, Article 2.5, Article 2.5, Article 2.5 of the PPA, Section 86(1)(e, Section 61, Article 9.2 of the PPA, Article 9.2 of the PPA, Section 62, the Contract Act

CARDINAL: 1, 60, 2004.2, 2, 5, 2005.4, 16, 2, 2 to 5, 2.5, 50, 1, 2., 2005.8, 5, 2 to 5, 155.46, 2260, 2 to 5, 2, 14,15 and 16, 14, two, 15, 4, 5, 16, 2002.13, 2 to 5, 1, 2, One, 15, 2, 5, 2 to 5, 9, 2260, only 5.9, 16, 14, 16, 11 to 13, 9.2, 9.6, 9.2, 2, 3, 2 to 5, 2 to 5, NCE-, 140.24, 612, 4, 8,000, 2,000, 3,28,043.00, 2,16,450.00, 7, 185(3, 2000, 3,29,663.00, 4.01, 9,872.00, 1, 2, 34, 35, one, 163

ORG: Industries Ltd., Respondent, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, R.P. No, Commission, Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation Ltd., Eastern Power Distribution Company, Government of Andhra Pradesh, MW Capacity, Commission, Commission, Order, Appellant, Tariff, Tariff, APTRANSCO, APTRANSCO, APTRANSCO, APTRANSCO, APTRANSCO, APTRANSCO, Commission, all H.T. Industrial Consumers, Business Houses, Hotels, Hostels, Choultries, Restaurants, Clubs, Theatres, Railway Stations, the Consultative Committee, CCITI, Government of A.P., FSA, Factor on Contracted Maximum Demand, Appellant, Respondents, Tariff Order, Appellant, Appellant, Tariff, Appellant, TD, FD, SA Fans, D.G. Set, the Sugar Plant, the Sugar Plant, D.G. Set, the Sugar Plant, Appellant, Appellant, Review Petition, the High Court, The High Court, the Writ Petition, Order, Appellant, Commission, Order, the first Respondent Commission, Commission, Appellant, the first Respondent Commission, Appellant, Respondent, Commission, Respondent, Commission, Order, Commission, Commission, Commission, A.P. Electricity Reform Act, Commission, Order, APTRANSCO, Commission, APTRANSCO, Commission, APTRANSCO, APTRANSCO, Commission, APTRANSCO, Company, Company, APERC, Biomass, Energy, Company, APTRANSCO/DISCOM, H.T. Agreement, APTRANSCO, Temporary, Company, H.T Agreement, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Order, Respondents Nos, this Tribunal on 25^th September,, GMR Industries Ltd., Appellant, Respondents, MW, Commission, NCE, Commission, Appellant, the Regulatory Commission, the Regulatory Commission, the Commercial Operation Date, COD, the Commercial Operation Date, COD, APERC, APERC, Government of Andhra Pradesh, APTRANSCO, Company, APTRANSCO, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Agreement, APERC, APERC, Schedule 1, the State Commissions, the NCE-Developers, Commission, NCE-, Commission, Act.20, Appellant, Tariff, Ferro, Commission, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, Commission, Appellant, PPA, Respondents, Tribunal, Small Hydro Power Developers Associations, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Commission, Commission, the NCE generators.27, NCE Developers v.Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., the State Commission, the National Electricity Policy, Commission, Commission, APERC, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Citi Bank N.A. v., Standard Chartered Bank, Tribunal, Chemicals Ltd., the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Commission

ORDINAL: first, third, first, second, first

DATE: 17^th July, 2004, 18^th November, 2004, 9^th June, 1956, a period of, 20 years, 14^th August, 2001, June 2001, 2001, 14^th August, 2001, 23^rd March, 2004, the month, annual, monthly, 2000-2001, monthly, 2000-01, 31^st March, August 2001, October 2003, November 2003, November 2003, months, August 2001 to October 2006, 17^th July, 2004, 2004, 2005, 13^th July, 2005, 14^th September, 2005, 17^th July, 2004, 2nd January, 2002, 2nd January, 2002, 17^th July, 2004, 2nd January, 2002, 2nd January, 2002, 2nd January, 2002, 1998, 2nd January, 2002, 2nd January, 2002, November 2003 to April 2004, 2nd January, 2nd January, 2002, 2nd January, 2002, 2006, a month, 15, 17^th July, 2004, a period of, 20 years, the twentieth (20th, a period of twenty years, 90 days, twenty years, monthly, nearly three years, 35 months, 5 months, a month, each day of the month, a month, the month of November 2003, that month, 1000-2000, the month of November 2003, monthly, 1998, 1998, 2003, August, 2001, October, 2003, November, 2003, November, 2003, 1110, the month, 2nd June, 2006, 5, 2005, 28^th September, 2006, 90, 91, 92, 2006, 2nd January, 2002, 7^th July, 2006, 2005, 17^th July, 2004, 2004, eight weeks

GPE: O.P., Sugar, Billing, O.P., justice.12, Bagasse, H.T., H.T-1, Sugar, Appellant, Bagasse, TNEB, O.P.

PERSON: Review Order, Tariff, Ferro Alloys, Tariff, Cinemas, kVA, Load Factor, kVA, Order, The Order of the Commission, Gross, Order, kVA, Order, Appellants, Appellant, Order, Tariff, kVA, kVA, Tariff, Kothari Sugar, Order

PRODUCT: Appellant, The "NCE Cogen, the "NCE Cogen, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

TIME: the total hours, the total hours, the total hours, number of hours, hours, 30 minutes

WORK_OF_ART: The Water Works of Municipalities and Corporations, Demand Charges, Maximum Demand, the Respondents 2, Maximum Demand, Maximum Demand

MONEY: 80 per cent, 85 per cent, 85 per cent, 30 per cent, 66 per cent, 14 per cent, nearly 66 per cent, 80 per cent

NORP: DISCOMS, H.T.-I

FAC: the Sugar Plant

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, premises, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent