State of Orissa Vs. Gokul Barik - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Nov-20-1958

Court: Orissa

LAW: Section 171D, the Indian Penal Code, Section 171F, Section 171D, Section 171D, Section 171F.Section, Section 171D, Section 171D, Section 511, Indian Penal Code, Section 171D., Section 171F, Section 171F, Chapter IXA, the Indian Penal Code, Section 171F, Section 196, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 171F under Section 196, Section 171F, Section 171F

ORG: G.C. Das, the State of Orissa, the Patnagarh Assembly Constituency, Magistrate, Government Advocate, Court, Ghutna, P.W. 2, Ext, Ext, the Allahabad High Court, AIR 1925, Muichand v. Emperor, AIR 1937 Sind 21, Emperor, AIR 1941 Sind 109.The, Mahomed Din v. Emperor, AIR, Court, the State Government, the State Government, Magistrate

NORP: J.1, Ghasian, Chasian

PERSON: Sri I. C. Misra, Gokul Barik, Ghuma Barik, Rule I., S. C. Das, Ghuma Barik, Nirakar, Ghuma, Nirakar, Nirakar, I. P. C.His, Das, Ahmcd Haji Sidik, I. P. C. Similarly, J. P. C., I. P. C.

GPE: Bolangir-Kalaliandi, Ghuma, Malkhan, Singh v. Emperor

CARDINAL: 19-10-1957, 12, 1, 2, 6, 2, 226, two, 196

ORDINAL: first, first, 1st, second, second, third, second, second, second, third, second

DATE: three months, the 1st, the 1st, 1950, 1898

PRODUCT: P.W. 4, Lah 52