Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bbn Industries Association and Vs. H.P. Electricity Regulatory

Decided On : Aug-21-2006

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: The Societies Registration Act, the Impugned Orders:, the Electricity Act, Section 9, Section 73(b, Section 73 of Electricity Act, Chapter V, Tariff Order of, Section 86, The Electricity Act, Section 42, the Grid Code, Section 79, Section 3.12, Section 45, the Electricity Act, Section 73(b, the Regulations 2004

CARDINAL: 1, 500, 150, 50, 175, 100, 240, 2, six, 86, 248, 100, 175, 50, 150, about 25, about 25, 8.22, 2, 8.22.1, 50, 50, 519, 500, 5, only three, three, three, 6., 50, 5, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 60 to 300, 8.23.1, 8.23.1, 3, 45(3, Two, less than 100, 2003.28

DATE: 29^th June, 2005, the year 2005-06, 3^rd September, 2005, 29^th June, 2005, 29^th June, 2005, 1^st July, 2005 to 31^st March, 2006, 1860, Annual, 2005-06, 64, 2003, 2004, May, 2005, year 2005-06, 29^th June, 2005, 1^st July, 2005, 29^th June, 2005, 2005, 29^th June, 2005, 2001-02, FY 2004-05, 29^th June, 2005, 31^st March,, 2006, Annual, six month, 1000, 2004, 2003, five years, 2005-06, Para 2.2.3, this year, this financial year, the next year, restructuring.11, 2003, 2003, five years, 2004, 2004, five years, 31

ORG: the Himachal State Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Annual Revenue Requirement and Tariff, the Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board, the Review Petition, Appellants, Commission, the Harmonic Injection Penalty of Rs, Commission, the Contract Demand, Commission, the Contract Demand, Demand Charges, Small and Medium Industry, Demand Charges for Scheduled Commercial Supply, the State of Himachal Pradesh, Commission, the Second Respondent Board, Distribution and Retail Supply Tariff, Transmission and Bulk Supply Tariff and Generation Tariffs, Sections 62, the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Determination of Tariff) Regulations, Commission, Commission, Baddi, Commission, Appellants, Review Petition, Commission, Commission, Appellants, the Impugned Orders, Small and Medium Industry, Large Industry, EHT, LS, Commission, Tariff, Commission, Commercial Supply, Small and Medium Industry, Commission, the Tariff Orders for, Commission, the National Electricity Policy, Commission, Commission, Board, Commission, Board, Commission, HPSEB, Commission, Board, inter alia, Commission, ARR, Board, Board, Commission, ARR, Board, Board, Commission, Harmonic Injection Penalty, Large Industrial and Small &, Medium Industrial Power, Board, Commission, Board, Commission, Board, Board, Commission, the Central Electricity Authority, the Draft Central Electricity Authority, Central Electricity Authority, CEA, Chapter IV, Distribution Systems, the Himachal Pradesh Electricity, the State Power Transmission System, the Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Board, Commission, Board, Commission, the Respondent Board, Board, Commission, inter alia, Tariff Order, the Respondent Board, Commission, Board, Respondent Board, Commission, the Respondent Board, inter alia, the State Commissions, State Commission, the State Commission, State, Licensees, Licensees, State, Licensees, Arbitration, State, Licensees, State Commission, the State Government, State, the State Commission, State Commission, the State Commission, the National Electricity Policy, Commission, State, Board, the Statutory Authority, Board, Board, Reform, Commission, Board, ARR, the Appellant association, Commission, National Electricity and Tariff, Commission, Demand Charges, Commission, Commission, the Demand Charges, Tariff, Board, Commission, Demand Charges, the Respondent Board, Demand Charges, The Demand Charges, Tariff, Demand Charges and Energy Charges.21, Further Respondent Board, the Demand Charges/Fixed Charges, Second Respondent Board, Appellants, Contract, Commission, Commission, the "Harmonic Injection Penalty, Large Industrial and Small and Medium Power, Commission, The Respondent Board, Commission, Central Electricity Authority, CEA, CEA, Respondent Board, Commission, CEA, the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Determination of Tariff) Regulations, Harmonic Injection, Appellants, CEA, Commission, Harmonic Injection, Commission, CEA, Harmonic Injections

WORK_OF_ART: Impugned Orders, HT Supply, Reform Surcharge, Harmonic Injection Penalty, Demand Charges Rate X

PERSON: Quash, Quash, Quash, kVA, kVA, kVA, Appellants, kVA, kVA, kVA, Appellant, HPSEB, Appellant, Reform Surcharge, Reform Surcharge, Licensee, Reform Surcharge, Orissa, Levy, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, HPSEB, HPSEB, bill delivery, Maximum Demand, Regulations, Gazette, Reform Surcharge

MONEY: 5 per cent, 80 per cent, 100 per cent, 300 per cent, 75 per cent, 60 per cent, 41 per cent, 2 per cent, 13.5 per cent, 4.1 per cent, 30 per cent, 75 per cent, 300 per cent, 5 per cent, 5 per cent, 5 per cent, 5 per cent, 5 per cent, 75 per cent - 80, only 9 per cent, 70 per cent, 4.1 per cent, 30 per cent, 12 per cent

PRODUCT: Table 8.8 of, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

PERCENT: 80%

EVENT: Clause 28

GPE: AP

NORP: Maharashtra, contra

ORDINAL: first, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //