Nayveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and

Decided On : Nov-09-2005

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: Regulations 16, the Electricity Act, Central Act 36, Section 111 of the Electricity Act, Section 58, Section 58, Section 61, The Electricity Act, Section 58, Section 61 of the 2003 Act, Section 59 of 1998 Act and Section 182 of, Section 61, Section 27 of the Act, Section 58, Section 27 of the Act, Section 27, the Electricity Act, Section 111 of the Act of, Section 121, Section 58, The Electricity Act

CARDINAL: 1, 21, two, two, 2, two, 323B, 3, 186, 178, 2003.6, two, 43, 31(4, 19, 17, 34, 55, 61, 178, 178

ORG: Appeals, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, Tribunal, Appellants, Regulations, Appellant, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Ors, v. Union of India 3, Counsel, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Supreme Court, inter alia, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Cellular Operators Association v.Union of India, Regulation, Appellate Tribunal, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Regulatory Commission, The Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, the High Court, Appellate Authority, the Regulatory Commission, the Supreme Court, Bengal Electricity Commission, Regulations, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Appellate Court, the High Court, The High Court, Commission, the High Court, Regulations, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the High Court, Commission, Calcutta, Commission, the Respondent Company, the High Court, the High Court, Regulations, Commission, the High Court, the High Court, the Respondent Company, the High Court, Regulations, the High Court, Commission, Commission, Appellate Court, K.S. Venkataraman &amp, Co., Raleigh Investment Co. Ltd., Council, ILR, United Motors, ITO, Tribunal, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Supreme Court, Electricity Board, Regulations, the Regulatory Commission, the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, Sections 68, Regulations, Tribunal

DATE: 2004, 2004, 2003, 16(i)(c, 16(i)(c, 2003, 2000, 2003, 1998, 2003, 42, 1998, 44, 1944, 1964, 46, 2003, 2003, 16(i)(c, 16(i)(c, 1998, 2003, 1998, 2003

WORK_OF_ART: Regulations

PERSON: V.R. Reddy, M.G. Ramachandran, Amit Kapur, Articles 323A, V.R. Reddy, M.G. Ramachandran, Amit Kapur, Shanti Bhushan, Mukul Rohtagi, Reddy, Ramachandran, Amit Kapur, Shanti Bhushan, Mukul Rohtagi, CESC Limited, Regulations, Regulations, Regulations, suo motu, Reddy

GPE: K.L.Shephard, L., Kumar v. Union of India, Bombay

FAC: Sections 61

ORDINAL: First, first, second

PRODUCT: Chettiar v., 151, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant