Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Asc Enterprises Ltd. and anr. and Vs. Mtv India Pvt. Ltd. and Set

Decided On : Feb-10-2006

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

LAW: Section 2, Section 36 of the Act, Section 36 of the Act, Section 36, Section 11, the TRAI Act, Section 2(k, the MRTP Act, the MRTP Act, Section 10, the TRAI Act, the MRTP Act, Section 10, Section 14, the MRTP Act, Section 12A, Section 12B, Section 14A, the TRAI Act, the MRTP Act, Section 14A, Section 10, the Interconnection Regulations, the Interconnection Regulations, Section 36, the Section 2, Section 2(j, the TRAI Act, the Interconnect Regulations of 10/12/2004, the Interconnection Regulations, Regulations 3.1, the Interconnect Regulations, the Statutory Regulations, the Interconnect Regulations, the Interconnect Regulations, the Interconnect Regulations, the Interconnect Regulations

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 1.2, One, 1, 85, 1, three, 1, two, two, 2, One, two, 4, 1, 1, 3/1/05, 1, One, 1, eleven, 1, eleven, two, 1, 1, two, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 36, 1, 6, 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.6, 1, 21/2/2005, 2, 1., 1, 1, One, 1, 1, two, 1, 2, 2, 5, 15.The, two, 16., 17, 3.2, 3.4, 2(j, 2(k, 2(n, 25, 10.12.2004, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, One, 2.According, 2, 1, One, 2, 1, one, one, 1, 3.2, 3.3, 1, 2, 1, 1, 11, 100, 3, One, 27, 3, one, 1, 2, two, 1., 1, 1, One, One, 1, 1, 1, 1, One, 1, two, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 152, 3.1, One, 11, One, 2, 1, One, 2, 11, 2, 1, 1, 11, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2.19, 2, 2, One, 2, 3.2, 3.3, 1, 1, 2, 11, 2, 1, 9, 1, 1, One, 2, 2, 1, One, 1, 2, two, 1, One, 1, 3.4, 1, 1, 1

ORG: M/s ASC Enterprises, Direct to Home (DTH, the Central Government, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, M/s New Era Entertainment Network Ltd, DTH, DTH, DTH, Cable System, Subscriber Management System, DTH, DTH Services, MTV, Nickelodeon, VH-1, VH-1, MTV, Nickelodeon, M/s SET Discovery Pvt. Ltd., M/s.MTV Pvt. Ltd., MTV, Nickelodeon, DTH, MTV, Nickelodeon, M/s, MTV, MTV, Nickelodeon, Alliance, TV Channels, the "One Alliance, DTH, MTV, Nickelodeon, MTV, MTV, Nickelodeon, Regulation 3 of the TRAI Regulations, MTV, Nickelodeon, Hon'ble Tribunal, Direct to Home (DTH, DTH, Respondents, DTH, Respondents, Dish TV DTH, MTV, Nickelodeon, DTH, The Central Government, Tele communication Services, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, the Central Government, The Ministry of Communication and Information Technolog, Department of Telecommunication) Notification, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, Central Government, Authority, the Telecommunication Authority of India Act, all Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable, the Petition, Respondent No, MTV, Nickelodeon, DTH, Petitioners, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, TDSAT, Tribunal, TDSAT, DTH, TDSAT, the MRTP Commission, the MRTP Commission, the Supreme Court, LJ 462, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, this Tribunal under Section 14, Regulations, Tribunal, Tribunal, TDSAT, the MRTP Commission, Definitions, the Central Government, Telecommunications (Broadcasting and Cable) Service Interconnection Regulations, Government, Government, this Tribunal under Section 14 of the Act, MSO, MSO, Tribunal, Sea TV, TDSAT, Tribunal, MTV, Nickelodeon, Regulations, MTV Pvt. Ltd., MTV, Nickelodeon, the Petitioner, Respondent No, MTV, Nickelodeon, Alliance, DTH, the 'One Alliance', Respondents, Petitioners, DTH, the 'One Alliance', Petitioners, DTH, the Cable Industry, Star, Alliance, Broadcasters, MTV, Nickelodeon, DTH, DTH, Alliance, the "One Alliance, Tribunal, MTV &, Nickelodeon, DTH, Dish TV DTH, DTH, MTV, the Telecommunication (Broadcasting &, Cable Services, this Tribunal in Petition No, MA No, Star India Pvt Ltd., Moon Network Pvt Ltd, MSO, MTV &, Nickelodeon, Tribunal, Respondents, TDSAT, Learned Senior Counsel, Tribunal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Appeal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Respondents, Alliance, MTV, Nickelodeon, MTV, the Interconnection Regulations.17, Petitioners, Respondents 1 &, Tribunal, DTH, Cable, Respondents, the 'One Alliance, Respondents 1 &, the Interconnect Regulation Clauses, Respondents, Tribunal, Mewar Channel v. Star India Pvt. Ltd., Tribunal, Mewar Channel, Mewar Channel, the Learned Counsel, Petitioners, Regulations, DTH, MSO, Petitioners, the Cable Television Network, DTH, Clauses 3.2, DTH, Tribunal, M.A.No.225

DATE: 16/7/2003, 30 days, 2005, More than 30 days, November 2004, 9/1/2004, 09/1/2004, the 9th January, 2004, 1997, 24 of 1997, 1997, 10/12/2004, 2004, thirty days, thirty days, forum.10, 1997, 30 days, the last date, the first day, 2005, 24/8/2005, 2004, 30 days, 15/7/2005, 2004, 2004, 9 January 2004, this petition.12, 27/12/2004, 26/11/2004, 4/12/2004, 26/11/2004, 10/12/2004, 13 of 2004, more than one year, 2004, August 2005, 2005, 2005, 2005, 24/12/2005, 30 days, 2005

PERSON: antenna, Regulations, Sanjay Hiremeth, Provisos, MSO, Zee Turner, Zee Turner, industry.14, Zee, Broadcaster, Abhishek Singhvi, Abhishek Singhvi, Petitioner, Shri Maninder, Singh, Regulations, Mewar Channel

WORK_OF_ART: Dish TV, Broadcasting Services, Direct to Home Operator

GPE: India, Mumbai, India, MA, India.9, New Delhi, India, electro, India, India, India, India

PRODUCT: Discovery, DISCOVERY, DISCOVERY, 20/7/2005, DISCOVERY, Respondent No.2, 07/3/2005, No.1, Bouquet

LOC: Respondent

ORDINAL: first, first, 24th

FAC: KU Band

TIME: the TRAI Act

NORP: Indian

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //