Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Ram Chandra Das and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Decided On : Aug-05-2004
Court : Jharkhand
LAW: Section 311, Section 311, Section 307, Section 326 to Section 324, Section 320(9, the Indian Penal Code, Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Indian Penal Code, Section 311, Section 311, Section 498A, Section 482, Section 482, Section 311, Section 311, Section 311
PERSON: S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1, Order, Koderma, Koderma, P. W. Nos, Nos, Tetri Devi v., Sukrp Mahto, Jhr, Surendra Nath Mahanty v. State, Mohd, Hussain Umar Kochar, K.S. Dolip Singhji, P.C., Tetri Devi v. Sukro Mahto, Tetri Devi v. Sukro Mahto, B.S. Joshi v. State, P.C., Nos, Nos, Lakshman Uraon, J.8
DATE: 14th May, 2003, 1999, 1999, 1999, 2002, 3rd June, 2003, 2003, 2nd July, 2004, 1990, 1999, 1999, 2000, 2264, 2003, 2003, 2003
ORG: 1st Additional Sessions, G.R. Case No, Sections, 1st Additional Sessions, Learned Counsel, Court, P.W. Nos, the Trial Court, Reliance, Court, Court, Vijoy Ram and Ors, Court, Court, Order, Division, Learned Counsel, the Supreme Court, AIR 1988 SC 2111, the Apex Court, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Supp, Court, The Supreme Court, State of J & K, SLT, AIR 1999, SC, AIR 1999, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, AIR 1970, SC, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Arnita Das v. State of Bihar, CCR, AIR 2000, the Supreme Court, Vijoy Ram and Ors, Court, CCR, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Trial Court
CARDINAL: 490, 148, 343, 306, 1 to 6, 9, 1 to 6, 9, 1 to 6, 9, 3, 15, one, 189, 62, 317, 346, 1, 3, 2, 9, 1, 2, II, 140, 465, II, 524, 687=2003, 2, 220, 1 to 6, 9, 1 to 6
WORK_OF_ART: Koderma P.S. Case No, Orders, Vijoy and Ors
GPE: Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Single, Mahesh Chand, Rajasthan, Singh v. State of, M.P., Ramlal, Mahesh Chand, Orissa, IV, Cr, P.C., Cr, Jharkhand, Single, Jharkhand, Haryana, SC)=I, Cr, P.C., Cr, Cr, Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C.
PRODUCT: 895