Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Lachhmi Steel Industry Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Ministry of Finance,

Decided On : Jul-29-2008

Court : Jharkhand

LAW: the Orders No, Section 14, Section 35F, Section 35F, Section 35, Chapter, Section 11D, Rule 6, Section 35F, Article 226 of the Constitution

NORP: J.1, Central Excise

CARDINAL: 133, 76, 22.2.2008, 68,884/-, two, 20.9.2005, two, 24, 8.6.1999, 8, 5, 6

DATE: 22.10.2003, 22.10.2003, the years 1996-97 and 1999, 12.10.1998, 16.7.1999, 08.6.1999, the year 2005, 16.7.1998, 16.7.1999, 15.10.1999, 08.6.1999, 15.10.1999, 20.2.2001, 16.7.1999, 22.10.2003, 60 days, thirty days, 1944, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2003, 2003

LOC: Superintendent, Cenvat

ORG: the Central Excise Department, Dhanbad, Central Excise, Customs, the Office of Superintendent, Government, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Adjudicating Authority, the Commissioner (Appeals, Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Central Excise and Service Tax, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Office of the Commissioner (Appeals, Asst, Central Excise, the Commissioner (Appeals, Central Excise, Customs, Patna, Central Excise (Appeals, SECTION 35F. Deposit, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Cenvat Credit Rules, Cenvat Credit Rules, Cenvat Credit Rules, Court

PERSON: Petitioner, M.S. Mittal, Mokhtar Khan

GPE: Patna, Ranchi, Ranchi

ORDINAL: second, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //