Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Lachhmi Steel Industry Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Ministry of Finance,
Decided On : Jul-29-2008
Court : Jharkhand
LAW: the Orders No, Section 14, Section 35F, Section 35F, Section 35, Chapter, Section 11D, Rule 6, Section 35F, Article 226 of the Constitution
NORP: J.1, Central Excise
CARDINAL: 133, 76, 22.2.2008, 68,884/-, two, 20.9.2005, two, 24, 8.6.1999, 8, 5, 6
DATE: 22.10.2003, 22.10.2003, the years 1996-97 and 1999, 12.10.1998, 16.7.1999, 08.6.1999, the year 2005, 16.7.1998, 16.7.1999, 15.10.1999, 08.6.1999, 15.10.1999, 20.2.2001, 16.7.1999, 22.10.2003, 60 days, thirty days, 1944, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2003, 2003
LOC: Superintendent, Cenvat
ORG: the Central Excise Department, Dhanbad, Central Excise, Customs, the Office of Superintendent, Government, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Adjudicating Authority, the Commissioner (Appeals, Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Central Excise and Service Tax, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Office of the Commissioner (Appeals, Asst, Central Excise, the Commissioner (Appeals, Central Excise, Customs, Patna, Central Excise (Appeals, SECTION 35F. Deposit, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Cenvat Credit Rules, Cenvat Credit Rules, Cenvat Credit Rules, Court
PERSON: Petitioner, M.S. Mittal, Mokhtar Khan
GPE: Patna, Ranchi, Ranchi
ORDINAL: second, first