Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Smt. Neetu Devi and Others

Decided On : May-20-2015

Court : Delhi

LAW: Order XXII Rule 8, Order XXII Rule 8

MONEY: $ - 28

DATE: May, 2015 +, 2014, 1908, 20.04.2012, 1996, 2003, 2012, monthly, 2009, 27.12.1981, 28 years, 17).14, 2013, Appellant

ORG: MAC, APP, Appellant, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, Respondents no.1, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Appellant Insurance Company, Respondent no.5, Respondent no.5, Driving License of Respondent, the Appellant Insurance Company:(i, the Claims Tribunal, Respondent no.5, Driving License of Respondent, CPC, Trial Court, me.7, Notice, CPC, Respondent no.5, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Apex Court, United India Insurance co. Ltd., Lehru and Ors, the Insurance Company, the Appellant Insurance Company, the Claims Tribunal, Respondent no.5, Respondents no.2, Smt, Ors, Delhi Transport Corporation, the School Leaving Certificate/Transfer Certificate, the Claims Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Respondents no.1, Respondents no.1, Appellant Insurance Company.18, the Appellant Insurance Company

PERSON: Neerja Sachdeva, Versus SMT, JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL, Award, LIABILITY5, R4W1 Shri Navneet Goel, Driving License, Driving License, Bench, Sohan Lal Passi, P. Sesh Reddy, COMPENSATION9 PW1 Smt, Neetu Devi, Amar Kumar, Dhaula Kuan, Sarla Verma, Anr, bench, Rajbir Singh, MAY20 2015

CARDINAL: 1, 10.12.2013, 15,77,575/-, 4, 04, 1/4, 17, 13,42,575/-.3, 2,35,000, 15,77,575/-, 1/3, 1/4, 8, three, 5, 3, 3, 1/3, 6, 12, 17.13, 10,88,000/-, 12, 2/3, 25,000/-, 10,000, three, 9, 15,77,575/-, 13,23,000/-.16, 4.17, 4

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Amar Kumar, PW2 Shri Rakesh

TIME: the intervening night

PERCENT: 50%, 50%, 80%

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Respondent no.4, Rajesh

NORP: Electrician, Electrician

FAC: 8,000/-.10

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //