Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Smt. Neetu Devi and Others
Decided On : May-20-2015
Court : Delhi
LAW: Order XXII Rule 8, Order XXII Rule 8
MONEY: $ - 28
DATE: May, 2015 +, 2014, 1908, 20.04.2012, 1996, 2003, 2012, monthly, 2009, 27.12.1981, 28 years, 17).14, 2013, Appellant
ORG: MAC, APP, Appellant, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, Respondents no.1, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Appellant Insurance Company, Respondent no.5, Respondent no.5, Driving License of Respondent, the Appellant Insurance Company:(i, the Claims Tribunal, Respondent no.5, Driving License of Respondent, CPC, Trial Court, me.7, Notice, CPC, Respondent no.5, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Apex Court, United India Insurance co. Ltd., Lehru and Ors, the Insurance Company, the Appellant Insurance Company, the Claims Tribunal, Respondent no.5, Respondents no.2, Smt, Ors, Delhi Transport Corporation, the School Leaving Certificate/Transfer Certificate, the Claims Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Respondents no.1, Respondents no.1, Appellant Insurance Company.18, the Appellant Insurance Company
PERSON: Neerja Sachdeva, Versus SMT, JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL, Award, LIABILITY5, R4W1 Shri Navneet Goel, Driving License, Driving License, Bench, Sohan Lal Passi, P. Sesh Reddy, COMPENSATION9 PW1 Smt, Neetu Devi, Amar Kumar, Dhaula Kuan, Sarla Verma, Anr, bench, Rajbir Singh, MAY20 2015
CARDINAL: 1, 10.12.2013, 15,77,575/-, 4, 04, 1/4, 17, 13,42,575/-.3, 2,35,000, 15,77,575/-, 1/3, 1/4, 8, three, 5, 3, 3, 1/3, 6, 12, 17.13, 10,88,000/-, 12, 2/3, 25,000/-, 10,000, three, 9, 15,77,575/-, 13,23,000/-.16, 4.17, 4
WORK_OF_ART: Shri Amar Kumar, PW2 Shri Rakesh
TIME: the intervening night
PERCENT: 50%, 50%, 80%
PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Respondent no.4, Rajesh
NORP: Electrician, Electrician
FAC: 8,000/-.10