Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dr. T.D. Padalia and anr. Vs. District Judge and ors.

Decided On : May-25-2007

Court : Uttaranchal

LAW: Order 6, Rule 17, Order 8, Rule 6-A of the C.P.C., Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Rule 6, Order 6, Rule 17, Order 8, Rule 6A, Order 6, Rule 17, Order 8 Rule 6, Order 8, Order 8, Order 6, Rule 17, Order 8, Rule 1, Rule 1, Rule 9, Order 6 Rule 17, Order 8 Rule 9, Rule 6-A., Order 6, Rule 17, Order 6, Rule 17

ORG: Verma, Civil Judge (Senior Division, Nainital, Court, Civil Judge (Senior Division, Court, Court, Court, Learned Counsel, the Apex Court, Budha Theh, AIR, Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Learned Counsel, Court, The Apex Court, Madhya Pradesh and Ors, Oriental Ceramic Products Pvt, Calcutta Municipal Corporation, AIR, Sushil Kumar Misra, LJ, Sudhir Kumar Wadhwa v., Shahjanpur and Ors, The Karnataka High Court, AIR, The Apex Court, Court, Court, CPC, Court, CPC, Judicial, Court, Inconvenience, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Trial Court, Court, Civil Judge (Senior Division, District Judge, the Civil Revision No, AIR 1991, Court, Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, MANU, Court, Court, Nainital, the Civil Judge (Senior Division, Court

NORP: J.1, Ardawatiya

PRODUCT: Judgment

CARDINAL: 15-4-2000, 14, 1, 2, 8, 7, 15-4-2000, 265, 1 to 3, 268, 15-4-2000, 3 to 6, 265, 1 to 3, 4, 250/-, 14, 265, 3 to 5, 15-4-2000, 10, 9, 10-8-1998, 1, 2, 3, 9, 265Ka, 3, 5, 10, 13, 10, 5, 7, 44 to 47, 3 and 4, 1, 2, 1, 2, 24, 12-20, 3, 265, 10, 23, 23, 23, 23, 10-3-1998, 10-8-1998, 26-10-1998, 6-10-1998.11, 3 to 5, 6, 1 to 3, 18, 3 to 5, 10-3-1998, 10-3-1998, 6, 1, 265, 1 to 3, 1987]3SCR155, 17, 283, 205, 1, 223, 283, 6C, 6, 6, 1, 2, 28, three, two, 3 to 5, 10, 6-10-1998, 23, 3 to 5, 6-10-1998, 265, 14, 21, 283, 265, 3 to 5, 14, 3 to 5, 265, 15-4-2000, 15-4-2000, 14, 3 to 5, 11

PERSON: Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Krishna Sanwal, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Rejoinder Affidavit, Nos, Nos, Jag Mohan Chawla, Anr, Dera Radha Swami Satsang, Nos, Ram Swaroop v., Mandir Thakran Kalyan Rai MANU, Nos, Mahendra Kumar, Anr, Ram Swaroop v., Mandir Thakran Kalyan Rai MANU, Shanti Rani Das, Dewanjee, Dinesh Chandra, MANU, Anil Panjwani, Parvathamma v. K.R. Lokanath and Ors, Karnataka, Shankunta Devi, rarvathamma v., K.R. Lokanath, Rules 6A, Rules 8A, Anil Panjwani, Rule 6A, Nos, Nos, Nainital, Karnataka, Anil Panjwani, Nos, Nos, Nos

DATE: 1988, 7-9-1998, the same day, Para 25, 4, 22, 23, 6-10-1998, 1900, 1087, 6-10-1998, 1991, 1988, 1997, 8, 6, 8, 9, 1976, '19, 1991, 1988

LOC: the District Judge, IV Additional District, the District Judge

TIME: 6-10-1998

MONEY: 5ehalf

GPE: Counsel, Khasra, C.P.C., C.P.C., Smt, C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., AIR, C.P.C.

FAC: Gurbachan Singh v. Bhag Singh, Para No, Ramesh Chand Ardwatiya, Karnataka 283

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //