Semantic Analysis by spaCy
The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Maha Laxmi Sugar Mills Company Ltd.
Decided On : Jul-04-2008
Court : Uttaranchal
LAW: Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, Section 77 of the Finance Act, Section 69, the Finance Act, Section 70, the Finance Act, Section 70, Section 70, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Chapter, Section 77 of the Finance Act, Section 70, Section 70, Constitutional, Section 117 of the Finance Act, Section 77 of the Finance Act, Section 70
PERSON: Prafulla C. Pant, J.1, Central Excise, Counsel
DATE: 1944, 1994, 20003, 1994, 1994, the quarter ending, December 1997, 17.04.1998, 29.01.2002, 1994, 1994, quarterly, fifteen days, the preceding quarter, the quarter, thirty days, 1994, every day, the quarter ending December 1997, 23.01.2002, quarter, 1999, 1944, 2000, April 2000, 1994, only quarter ending December 1997, 1994
CARDINAL: 03.12.2004, 31.03.2000, half, 27.01.2004, 03.12.2004, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, less than one hundred, two hundred, 1,000/-, 1999ECR53(SC, 2(d)(i, one, 1,000/-, 31.03.2000
ORG: Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, ST/69/04-NB(S, Central Excise, Saharanpur, Central Excise, Central Excise, ST/69/04-NB(S, CESTAT, the Central Government, CESTAT, the Supreme Court, Laghu Udyog Bharati, Anr, Union of India, the Finance Rules, Clearing, Central Excise, CESTAT
GPE: New Delhi, Iqbalpur, Haridwar, Apex, Counsel
TIME: 23.01.2002 i.e.
NORP: Statute, Central Excise