Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Central Excise
Decided On : Mar-18-2009
Court : Uttaranchal
LAW: Section 35H, S-131, Rule 57, the Modvat Scheme, Rule 57 G, the Rule 57-I, Rule 57, the Modvat Scheme, Section 37, Section 37, Central Excise Act
PERSON: Prafulla C. Pant, A/922/2000-NB, C. Excise Meerut, Modvat Scheme, Kusum Ingot's, Meerut, Transmitter, Z.U. Alvi, Vadodara v., Said Clause, Kusum Ingots
DATE: 1944, 21.03.2003, 2002, 30.09.2002, 21/03/2003, 26/06/1996, 27/08/1996, 21/03/2003, 19/10/2000, the period of, six months, 2000, 1999, 29/06/1995, 1999, 1944, the period December 1995 to March 1996, 26.06.1996 and 27.08.1996, six months, six months, 30.09.2002, six months old, 1944, 21.03.2003, 15.12.1987, 20.12.1988, 14.05.1992, 2001, 15.12.1987, 20.12.1988, 14.05.1992, 1944, six months, six months, the last date, six months', five years', 6 months, 5 years, 15.12.1987, 14.05.1992, 20.12.1988, 27.02.1997, 27.02.1997, 29.06.1995, Rule 57, 1944, six months, 29.06.1995, six months, the period of, six months
ORG: Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, Court, Tribunal, BHEL, CCE/Meerut's, CESTAT, Show Cause Notice, SCN, Modvat Credit, Adjudicating Authority, SCN, Appeals, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Hon'ble Supreme Courts, Eicher Motors Case, Supreme Court, Eicher Motors, Account, 3 Supreme Court's, Modvat Credit, Tribunal, M/s Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd., BHEL, Thermal & Hydro Turbines, Generators, Electric Motors, BHEL, BHEL, CESTAT, Tribunal, the Adjudicating Authority, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Adjudicating Authority, Cenvat, the Adjudicating Authority, Cenvat, Cenvat Credit, the Central Excise Rules, Tribunal, Tribunal, Adjudicating Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, Court, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Board, Modvat Credit, Officer, Superintending Central Excise, Kalyani Packaging Industries v. Union of India MANU/SC/0527/2004, Collector of Central Excise, Dhiren Chemical Industries, the Apex Court, the Board of Central Excise, Central Excise Department, the Government of India, the Superintending Central Excise, Modvat Credit, Modvat Credit, Court, Central Board of Excise, Customs, the Jurisdictional Central Excise, Range Superintendents, Superintendent Central Excise, Learned Counsel, Court, Eicher Motors Ltd., Union of India, the Modvat Credit Scheme, Eicher Motors Ltd., XXVIII, un, this Sub-Rule, the Modvat Credit Scheme, Alloys Ltd., Central Excise, ELT, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, Tribunal
GPE: New Delhi, S.C., Assessee, Assessee, Counsel, New Delhi, Counsel, New Delhi, New Delhi
CARDINAL: 1, 36-37, 2, 120, 106, 2, 3, Two, 57, 19.10.2000, two, 1, 4., 3/92, 2008(231)ELT22(SC, 2004(168)ELT145(SC, 12, 3/92, 1, 1, 2, 5, 1999ECR7(SC, 28/95, 2, 120, 214, 29.06.1995, 19.10.2000, 19.10.2000, 3, 3, 6.
PRODUCT: O-1, S-37, F 267/104/87-CX .8, LCX 0010, F 267/104/87-CX .8
NORP: Superintendent Central Excise's, A/922-923/2000-NB
WORK_OF_ART: Superintendent Central Excise, Collector to Collector, Superintendent Central Excise
FAC: Kusum Ingots Case
ORDINAL: third, First
TIME: 16.03.1995 i.e.