Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Central Excise

Decided On : Mar-18-2009

Court : Uttaranchal

LAW: Section 35H, S-131, Rule 57, the Modvat Scheme, Rule 57 G, the Rule 57-I, Rule 57, the Modvat Scheme, Section 37, Section 37, Central Excise Act

PERSON: Prafulla C. Pant, A/922/2000-NB, C. Excise Meerut, Modvat Scheme, Kusum Ingot's, Meerut, Transmitter, Z.U. Alvi, Vadodara v., Said Clause, Kusum Ingots

DATE: 1944, 21.03.2003, 2002, 30.09.2002, 21/03/2003, 26/06/1996, 27/08/1996, 21/03/2003, 19/10/2000, the period of, six months, 2000, 1999, 29/06/1995, 1999, 1944, the period December 1995 to March 1996, 26.06.1996 and 27.08.1996, six months, six months, 30.09.2002, six months old, 1944, 21.03.2003, 15.12.1987, 20.12.1988, 14.05.1992, 2001, 15.12.1987, 20.12.1988, 14.05.1992, 1944, six months, six months, the last date, six months', five years', 6 months, 5 years, 15.12.1987, 14.05.1992, 20.12.1988, 27.02.1997, 27.02.1997, 29.06.1995, Rule 57, 1944, six months, 29.06.1995, six months, the period of, six months

ORG: Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, Court, Tribunal, BHEL, CCE/Meerut's, CESTAT, Show Cause Notice, SCN, Modvat Credit, Adjudicating Authority, SCN, Appeals, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Hon'ble Supreme Courts, Eicher Motors Case, Supreme Court, Eicher Motors, Account, 3 Supreme Court's, Modvat Credit, Tribunal, M/s Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd., BHEL, Thermal & Hydro Turbines, Generators, Electric Motors, BHEL, BHEL, CESTAT, Tribunal, the Adjudicating Authority, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Adjudicating Authority, Cenvat, the Adjudicating Authority, Cenvat, Cenvat Credit, the Central Excise Rules, Tribunal, Tribunal, Adjudicating Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, Court, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Board, Modvat Credit, Officer, Superintending Central Excise, Kalyani Packaging Industries v. Union of India MANU/SC/0527/2004, Collector of Central Excise, Dhiren Chemical Industries, the Apex Court, the Board of Central Excise, Central Excise Department, the Government of India, the Superintending Central Excise, Modvat Credit, Modvat Credit, Court, Central Board of Excise, Customs, the Jurisdictional Central Excise, Range Superintendents, Superintendent Central Excise, Learned Counsel, Court, Eicher Motors Ltd., Union of India, the Modvat Credit Scheme, Eicher Motors Ltd., XXVIII, un, this Sub-Rule, the Modvat Credit Scheme, Alloys Ltd., Central Excise, ELT, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, Tribunal

GPE: New Delhi, S.C., Assessee, Assessee, Counsel, New Delhi, Counsel, New Delhi, New Delhi

CARDINAL: 1, 36-37, 2, 120, 106, 2, 3, Two, 57, 19.10.2000, two, 1, 4., 3/92, 2008(231)ELT22(SC, 2004(168)ELT145(SC, 12, 3/92, 1, 1, 2, 5, 1999ECR7(SC, 28/95, 2, 120, 214, 29.06.1995, 19.10.2000, 19.10.2000, 3, 3, 6.

PRODUCT: O-1, S-37, F 267/104/87-CX .8, LCX 0010, F 267/104/87-CX .8

NORP: Superintendent Central Excise's, A/922-923/2000-NB

WORK_OF_ART: Superintendent Central Excise, Collector to Collector, Superintendent Central Excise

FAC: Kusum Ingots Case

ORDINAL: third, First

TIME: 16.03.1995 i.e.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //