C.S. Angre Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax

Decided On : Nov-27-1967

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 27(1, Section 17(1)(b, the Jagirs Act, Section 3, Section 8(1, the Jagirs Act, Section 15, the Allahabad Bench, Section 17(1)(b, Section 17(1)(b, Section 34, Section 3, Section 2(m, Section 6, Section 2(e, Section 2(q, Section 3, the Income-tax Act, Section 19A, Section 2(e, the Jagirs Act, the Jagirs Act, Chapter II, Section 4, Section 4(1, Section 8, Section 8, Section 3, Section 15, the Jagirs Act, Section 8, Section 13, Section 14, Section 15, Section 8, Section 8, the Jagirs Act

ORG: Dixit, the Appellate Tribunal, the MadhyaBharat Abolition of Jagirs Act, Gwalior State, the Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act, State of Gwalior, the Appellate Tribunal, the Vindhya Pradesh Abolition of Jagirs and Land Reforms Act, The Allahabad Tribunal, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Bihar & Orissa, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Wealth-Tax Officer, the Appellate Tribunal, --'(m, ILR, E. D. Sassoon & Co. Ltd., ILR, Johnson Inspector, Taxes, Webb v. Stenton, State, Government, Government, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Patna High Court, Department

DATE: 1957, the assessment years 1957-58, 1958-59, 1959-60, 1960-61, 1951, December 1952, annual, each assessment year, 1952, 1922, 1957, 1922, Section 17(1)(b, the first day of April, 1957, six years, the last day, the previous year, that year, previous years, the last day, the previous years, the 31st day of March, 1871, 1909, 1909, 1946, 1883, 11, annual, annual, the day, 1967]64ITR147(AP

CARDINAL: 2., 2, ten, one, 1959]35ITR1(SC, 6., 14, 36, 36, 532, 518.'It, seven, 1, 2, 1, ten, 4, 1, 2, ten, 1963]50ITR216(AP, 1966]62ITR601(AP, 1967]65ITR460(Patna, 200/-

ORDINAL: 4th, first, first, second, first, second, first, first, second

NORP: jagir, Indian, Hindu, jagir

PERSON: Schedule, Dadu Jagdish-singh, Rewa, Kamal Singh, Dadu Jagdishsingh, Khan v. Rughoonath Pershad, Banchharam Majum-dar, Adyanath Bhattacharjea, Bhagwati J., solven dum, W. S. Try Ltd., Schedule, Schedule I., Schedule I., Imdad Ali Khan v. Commissioner of Wealth, Rani Bhagya Laxmamma v. Commissioner, Chandramani Pat-, Devi v. Commissioner of Wealth, Maharajkumar Kamal Singh

PRODUCT: Schedule, Cal 936

FAC: Cal 936 Mookerjee J., jagir, jagir

LOC: jagir, jagir

GPE: jagir, assessee, jagir

MONEY: 2 1/2 per cent