Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Avtar Singh Vs. Ito

Decided On : May-01-2003

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: section 260A, the Income Tax Act, section 54E, section 2(47, section 269UA.'9

PERSON: ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, Sumit Nema, Rohit Arya, Shri Nema, Vimal Lalchand, Mutha

DATE: 1961, 1999, '1, the assessment year 1991-92, 29,270.3, the assessment year, or(iii, 1882, 4 of 1882

CARDINAL: 29, 2, 2, 26,800, 13,060, 48,010, 30,000, 18,28,565, 3-11-1995, 18,28,565.6, 2, 11-8-1990, 2003]260ITR491(Bom, 2001]248ITR6(SC, 11-8-1990, 22-10-1990, 1

ORG: the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, the Transfer of Property Act, ExplanationFor, Chaturbhuj Dwarkadas Kapadia v., Supreme Court, CIT, Lordships, The Tribunal on the basis of general power, M/s. Chankdrika Apartment, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal

TIME: 54F of the Act

GPE: Tribunal.12

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //