Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mahendra Kumar Vs. Union of India and anr.

Decided On : Mar-18-1996

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: the Amendment Act, the Amendment Act, the IT Act

ORG: Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, ITO B Ward, Sharad Textiles Agency, ITO, Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, HUF, AOP, BOI, the Central Government or State Government, National Deposits Scheme, AOP, BOI, HUF, BOI, HUF, AOP, BOI, HUF, HUF, Arts

DATE: 1984, 1st April, 1976, 1985-86, 1961, 1985-86, 1984, 1st April, 1976, 1984, 1st April, 1976, 1983-84, 1984-85, 1984, 11th March, 1988, 1984, 1984, some quarters, 1st April, 1976, 1961

CARDINAL: 3, 2, three, 3,076, 3,076, 3, 3, 1984.3, 148, 3, 3, 80L., 80L(3, 7,000, 13,000, 1, 80L, 1, 3, 14 and 19, 3, 271(1)(C, 3

GPE: Ujjain, Ujjain, Harishchand, Kumar, Ujjain

PERSON: under s. 80L, Shri Tankha, Shri Nema

PRODUCT: Act.4

LOC: Shri Rawat

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //