Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rathi Finlease Ltd.

Decided On : Oct-11-2007

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 260A, the IT Act, Section 68, the IT Act, Section 143(3, Section 68 of the Act, Section 68, Section 68

PERSON: Kulshrestha, Shri Sanyal

NORP: J.1

DATE: 1961, 17th March, 2004, 2000-01, the year 2000-01, the same day, 24th July, 2003, any previous year, last year, this year, Oct., 2002, the very day, 24th July, 2003

ORG: the Tribunal dt., Tribunal, AO, M/s Flag Synthetics, Palasiya Leasing & Investment, Patni Industries Ltd., AO, AO, income.4, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, AO, Tribunal, AO, Counsel for the Revenue, CIT, Sophia Finance Ltd., Lordships, ITO, the Calcutta High Court, CIT, Kundan Investment Ltd., AO, AO, Flag Synthetics, Palasiya Leasing & Investment, Patni Industries, AO, AO, AO, Flag Synthetics Ltd., Palasiya Leasing & Investment, Patni Industries Ltd., the Flag Synthetics Ltd., AO, Palasiya Leasing & Investment, M/s Patni Industries Ltd.12, AO, Learned Counsel, the Supreme Court, CIT, Stellar Investment Ltd., Tribunal, Steller Investment Ltd., the High Court, the Tribunal on the ground, Reliance, the Delhi High Court, CIT v. Antarctica Investment, Antarctica Investment, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, AO, Tribunal

GPE: ITA-825

CARDINAL: 15,00,000, 3,56,325, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 15,00,000, 3,56,325, two, 15,00,000, three, 1994]205ITR98(Delhi, 2003]263ITR626(Cal, 16,90,000, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 2001]251ITR263(SC, 2003]262ITR493(Delhi, three, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, three, 2, 2, 1).18

PRODUCT: the Full Bench of, AO.10

ORDINAL: first, 4th, first