Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Essco Sanitations Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Decided On : Aug-04-1989
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: Rule 173-J, Rule 10, the Preventive Officers, Notification 176/77, Section 4, Section 4, Rule 173J, Rule 10
CARDINAL: 1, 28, 10-7-1980, 1,28,824.23, 14, 30, 18-6-1977, 30, 30, 17, 22, 306, 24, 338, 17, 607, 176/77, one, two, 30, 30, 174
PERSON: Shri A.N. Sharma, Shri S. Krishnamurthy, Shri A.N. Sharma, Salt Act, Salt Act, Baroda, ELT
DATE: six months, 1944, the year 1977-78, the preceding financial year, the financial year 1977-78, 1944, the year 1977-78, 1977-78, 1944, 1984, the preceding financial year
ORG: the Central Board of Excise &, Customs, the Collector of Central Excise, the Central Excise Rules, Central Excise Tariff Item, Board, Collector, the Central Excises &, Board, The Central Board of Excise &, Customs, Central Excises &, Union of India, Jyoti Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Bombay Tyre International, ELT, the Supreme Court, Bombay Tyre International, Union of India, Godfrey Philips India Ltd. &, ELT, Collector, Super Traders v., ELT, Tribunal, Board, Appellate, Board, Coromandel Fertilisers Ltd., Union of India, ELT, SDR, Appellate, Board, The Gujarat High Court, Court, the Chartered Accountant, Tribunal, the Central Board of Ex. &
GPE: New Delhi, Delhi
NORP: Gujarat, a Chartered Accountant
FAC: J-238, the Show Cause Notice
WORK_OF_ART: Collector of Central Excise -1987
PERCENT: 15%, 15%
ORDINAL: first, second, first, second