Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Essco Sanitations Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Decided On : Aug-04-1989

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Rule 173-J, Rule 10, the Preventive Officers, Notification 176/77, Section 4, Section 4, Rule 173J, Rule 10

CARDINAL: 1, 28, 10-7-1980, 1,28,824.23, 14, 30, 18-6-1977, 30, 30, 17, 22, 306, 24, 338, 17, 607, 176/77, one, two, 30, 30, 174

PERSON: Shri A.N. Sharma, Shri S. Krishnamurthy, Shri A.N. Sharma, Salt Act, Salt Act, Baroda, ELT

DATE: six months, 1944, the year 1977-78, the preceding financial year, the financial year 1977-78, 1944, the year 1977-78, 1977-78, 1944, 1984, the preceding financial year

ORG: the Central Board of Excise &, Customs, the Collector of Central Excise, the Central Excise Rules, Central Excise Tariff Item, Board, Collector, the Central Excises &, Board, The Central Board of Excise &, Customs, Central Excises &, Union of India, Jyoti Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Bombay Tyre International, ELT, the Supreme Court, Bombay Tyre International, Union of India, Godfrey Philips India Ltd. &amp, ELT, Collector, Super Traders v., ELT, Tribunal, Board, Appellate, Board, Coromandel Fertilisers Ltd., Union of India, ELT, SDR, Appellate, Board, The Gujarat High Court, Court, the Chartered Accountant, Tribunal, the Central Board of Ex. &amp

GPE: New Delhi, Delhi

NORP: Gujarat, a Chartered Accountant

FAC: J-238, the Show Cause Notice

WORK_OF_ART: Collector of Central Excise -1987

PERCENT: 15%, 15%

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //