Babulal Vs. Jagtap Singh and anr.

Decided On : Jul-20-2001

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 30, Section 23, Section 30, Section 2(a, Section one hundred and seven, The States Reorganisation Act, Section 49, Article 225 of the Constitution of India, Section 59(1, the State Reorganisation Act, Article 225 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, The States Reorganisation Act, Cal 21, a Full Bench, Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 92A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 173 of the Act of 1988, Section 110-D of the old Act, Motor Vehicles Act

ORG: C.K. Prasad, Court, Court, Court, the High Court of Judicature at Nagpur, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, the High Court, Court, High Court, the Government of India Act, High Court, Division Court, the Government of India Act, High Court, Division Court, the Government of India Act, Court, High Court, Division Court, Their Privy Council, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the High Court, State of, State of Madhya Pradesh, the High Court of Judicature at Nagpur, Letters Patent, the Government of India Act, the High Court, Madhya Pradesh State, the High Court, the High Court, State of Madhya Pradesh, the High Court of Madhya, High Courts, the Nagpur High Court, Court, Court, Court, Division Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court of Nagpur, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, the High Court, Madhya Pradesh, Letters Patent, Constitution of India, the High Court, Court, State, AIR 1939 Nagpur 122, the Privy Council, Lordships, Clause 10, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Court, Court, Bench, Court, Oriental Insurance Company Limited Napier, Ors, AIR 1995, M.P. 244, Court, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Court, L.P.A., The Oriental Insurance Company v., Court, the Letters Patent (Nagpur, the Letters Patent Appeal, the Nagpur High Court, Court, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Court, the Judgment of, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Letters Patent Appeal, Wells, Court, Court, Ghasi Ram, Court, Schedule II.13, Court, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Court

DATE: August 4, 1998, May 12, 1987, 10/- per day, 10/- per day, 1956, November 1, 1956, November 1, 1956, 1915, January 26, 1950, 1956, November 1, 1956, January 26, 1950, 1992, 1988, '10, the preceding twelve months, 1960, the preceding twelve months, the preceding twelve months

PERSON: Misc, Jaya Laxmi Aiyer, Sri Nitin Pendharkar, Sri Pendharkar, George the Vth, Pendharkar, Geeta, Pendharkar, Gita, Jabalpur v. Annamma Abraham, Insurer, Gita, Aiyer, Schedule II, Pendharkar, Sri Pendharkar, Schedule II, Schedule II, Pendharkar, Aiyer

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act

CARDINAL: one, 2, II, one, one, one, one, one, 128, 40, 17, 602, five, 10, more than twenty-five, more than twenty-five, more than twenty-five, twelve, two, twelve

GPE: Act.3, Us, Judges, Chintaman, C.R., well.12, Nannibai

LOC: Mango

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, the Full Bench

WORK_OF_ART: Schedule II

QUANTITY: twelve feet, twelve feet, twelve feet, twelve feet

ORDINAL: first, first, first