Shri Shankaranarayana Construction Company Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Decided On : Oct-11-2007

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 11(6, Article 254 of the Constitution, Section 11(6, Constitution, Section 11(6, Article 254 of the Constitution, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Article 254 of the Constitution as, the Arbitration Act, Article 254(2, Constitution, Article 254 of the Constitution, Article 254 of the Constitution, Article 254 of the Constitution, Article 254 of the Constitution, Article 254 of the Constitution, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, Article 254(2, Constitution, Article 254 of the Constitution, Article 254 of the Constitution shall, Section 2, the Bombay Act No, Section 7, Article 254(1, Constitution, the Central Amendment Act, Article 254(1, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 46, the Arbitration Act, Section 46, the Arbitration Act, Section 46, the Arbitration Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 52, the Electricity Act, Section 76(2, the Electricity Supply Act, the Constitution Bench, Section 2, Section 40, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2, Section 40, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 3 of the 1983, Section 7, Para 12, Section 2 of the Act of, Section 2, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 47, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act 1940, Section 46, Section 47, the Arbitration Act, Section 47, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 47, the Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 46, the Arbitration Act of 1940, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 7 of the, Section 2(1)(i, Section 2(1)(i, Section 3 of the 1983, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Article 254 of the Constitution, Article 254 of the Constitution, Article 254 of the Constitution, Article 254, Article 254(1, Article 254(2, Section 2, Section 7, Article 254(2, Article 254(1, the Central Amendment Act, Article 254(1, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 2 of the 1996, the Arbitration Act, Article 254 of the Constitution, Article 254 of the Constitution, Parliament, Section 2 of the 1996 Act, Section 11(6

PERSON: ORDERA.K. Patnaik, Rajeev Sagar Tank Project, S.E., Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, S.E., S.S. Naganand, Reasons, Bill, correct.5, Naganand, Naganand, Henry Ah Hoe, Anr, Naganand, Vinay Bubna, V.K. Shukla, Naganand, Shukla, Mahilpur v. Guru Nanak, Anr, Anr, Anr, Naganand, Shukla, Reasons, Bill, Bill, Bill, R.C. Lahoti, G.P. Singh, Reasons, Reasons, G.P. Singh, Manohar Lal v. The, N. Rajagopala Ayyangar, Scope(2, herein below:.Therefore, Madhya Pradesh, Naganand, herein below:254, Naganand, Anr, Naganand, Anr, T. Barai, Anr, Anr, Anr

GPE: Guna District, LA, Jabalpur, Act.3, Clause, Zaverbhai Amaidas, T. Barai, Mumbai, India, Bhaiji v. Sub-Divisional, pp, pp, India, India, Bhopal, Bhopal, Clause, India, Undertaking, Zaverbhai Amaidas, Zaverbhai Amaidas, T. Barai, T. Barai, T. Barai, T. Barai, Undertaking, Clause

CARDINAL: 19-2-1999, 50,000/-, 21.81, 7, 6-6-2002, three, 609, two, 4, 19-12-2003, 1999]1SCR89, 1, 2, 2, two, 2, 2, 799, 150, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 2002]SUPP5SCR116, 206-09, 206-09).Similarly, 1961CriLJ570a, 12, three, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 41, 43, 4, 2, 3, 4, 4, 1, 41, 43, 4, one, 1, 15, fifty thousand, fifty thousand, fifty thousand, fifty thousand, two, 4, 5, 5, 4, 4, 5, 5, 4, 5, 1964]3SCR116, 5, 5, 1, 5, 5, 2, 1, 55, 799, 809)21, two, two, two, two, 23, 4, 5, 4, 5, 13, 2, 2, 4, 5

ORG: the Conditions of Contract, the Superintending Engineer, Tribunal, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the Executive Engineer, Tribunal, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the High Court, Arbitral, the Writ Petition under Article 226 of the, Court, an Interlocutory Application, MCC, the High Court, Arbitration Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court at Gwalior, Parliament, the State Legislature, Bhanu Kumar Jain & Associates, Court, Court, Spedra Engineering Corporation, Contractors, Parliament, the State Legislature, Bhanu Kumar Jain & Associates, the Supreme Court, Sundaram Finance Limited v., NEPC India Limited, the Statement of Objects, State Government, Court, Bhanu Kumar Jain & Associates, the State Government, the Legislature of a State, Parliament, Parliament, the Concurrent List, Parliament, the Legislature of a State, the Legislature of the State, the Legislature of a State, Parliament, the Legislature of a State, State, Court, Spedra Engineering Corporation Engineers and Contractors, the State of M.P., the Proviso to Clause, Parliament, the Legislature of a State, State, Parliament, the State of M.P., Parliament, the State of Bombay 1955, the Supreme Court, Parliament, AIR 1983, SC, the Supreme Court, Parliament, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, State, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, the State Legislature, Bhanu Kumar Jain & Associates, Bhanu Kumar Jain, the Bombay High Court in Stock Exchange, the State of M.P., the State of M.P., the Arbitration Tribunal, Court, Spedra Engineering Corporation, Contractors, AIR, the State of M.P., Tribunal, the State of M.P., Punjab State Electricity Board, Cold Storage & Ice Factory, the Supreme Court, Arbitration Act, the Vessel M.V. ', State Trading Corporation of India Limited, the Supreme Court, the State of M.P., Bhanu Kumar Jain, the Statement of Objects, the Statement of Objects, the Statement of Objects, Counsel, the State of M.P., the Division Bench, Court, Bhanu Kumar Jain & Associates, the State Government, Arbitration Tribunal, the Arbitration Tribunal, the Arbitration Tribunal, the Arbitration Tribunal, Spedra Engineering Corporation, the Arbitration Tribunal, Spedra Engineering Corporation, AIR, Arbitration Tribunal, State, Tribunal, Bhanu Kumar Jain & Associates, State of M.P. and Ors, the Division Bench, State, Bhanu Kumar Jain & Associates, State of M.P. and Ors, State, State, Public Undertakings, State, State, Tribunal, State, State, Tribunal, Tribunal, a High Court, Tribunal, the State Government in Public Works, the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, the Accountant General, State, Division Bench, Court, Spedra Engineering Corporation, Bhanu Kumar Jain, the Arbitration Tribunal, Societe De Traction et, D'Electricite Societe Anonyme, Kamani Engineering Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, Lordships, Legislature, Arbitration, the Supreme Court, Societe De Traction et, D'Electricite Societe Anonyme, Kamani Engineering Co. Ltd., AIR, Legislature, Arbitration, Sections 3 to 38 of the Arbitration Act, Arbitration, the Arbitration Tribunal, the State Government, the State Government or Public Undertakings, the Arbitration Tribunal, the State Government, Parliament, the Legislatures of States.--(1, the Legislature of a State, Parliament, Parliament, the Concurrent List, Parliament, Legislature, State, the Legislature of the State, the Legislature of a State, Parliament, Legislature, State, State, Parliament, the Legislature of the State.20, Parliament, the Legislature of a State Legislate, the Concurrent List, Parliament, the Legislature of a State, Parliament, the Legislature of a State, the Concurrent List, the Legislature of a State, Parliament, Parliament, the Legislature of a State, Parliament, the Legislature of a State, Parliament, the Supreme Court, Parliament, the State Legislature, the State Legislature, Parliament, the State Legislature, the Supreme Court, The State of Bombay, Parliament, State, Parliament, State, The State of Bombay, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, the Union Parliament, State, State, State, Parliament, State, State, Parliament, State, Parliament, State, Parliament, Parliament, State, State, the Concurrent List, State, State, the Supreme Court, Parliament, Parliament, a State Legislature, Court, Paragraph 18, the Supreme Court, AIR, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Parliament, Parliament, the State Government, the State Government, the State Legislature, the Central Legislature, the State Government, MCC

LOC: Circle

DATE: 1983, 1983, 1983, 1996, 1983, 1996, 1996, 1983, 1983, 1996, 2003, 1983, 1983, 1997, 21-11-1997, 1983, 1983, 1996, 1983, 1940, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1940, 1983, 1940, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1947, 1946, 1950, 1976, 1954, 1954, 1973, 1983, 1983, 1940, 1940, 1940, 1983, 1983, 1983, Para 12, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1940, 1910, 1948, 1983, 1983, 2001, 2001, 1996, 1996, 1983, 1996, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, less than seven years, less than five years, less than five years, five years, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1996, 1940, 1940, 1940, 1937, 1940, Para 19, 1940, 1937, 1940, 1996, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1947, 1946, 1950, 1983, 1983, 1940, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983

PRODUCT: Para 8, Mahilpur, Para 9, Para 50, Mukherjee

EVENT: the 1996 Act

WORK_OF_ART: 'Principles of Statutory Interpretation', Scope', the Constitution of India