Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vijay Choudhary Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Dec-01-2009

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 65, the Evidence Act, P-5, Section 65, the Evidence Act, Section 35, the Indian Stamp Act, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 35, Section 65, the Evidence Act, Section 35 of the Act, Section 65 of the Evidence Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.7, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.9, Section 35, Section 65, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.(ii, Section 35, Section 35, Section 35, Section 65 of the Evidence Act, Section 35, Section 65, Section 35 of the Act, Chapter XII, Chapter XXXVI, Section 32, Section 61, Section 65 of the Evidence Act, Section 65, Section 66, Section 35, Section 63, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 35, Section 35, Section 35, Section 36, Section 36, Section 35, Section 35, Section 36, Section 35, Section 36, the Stamp Act, the Stamp Act, the Stamp Act nullifies Section 65 of the Evidence Act, Section 65, the Evidence Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 35 of the Act, Order 47 Rule 1, Section 65, Indian Evidence Act, Indian Stamps Act, the Indian Stamps Act, Order 47 Rule 1, Order 47 Rule 1, Section 65, Indian Evidence Act, Section 65, Indian Evidence Act, Section 35

ORG: ORDERDipak Misra, the High Court, Civil Revision, the Civil Revision, the Apex Court, AIR 1971, SC, Legislative, the Union of India, inter alia, Legislative, Standing Counsel for Union of India, Trial Court, Standing Counsel, the Union of India, State, Legislature, The Trial Court, AIR 1971, AIR, SC, Board of Control for Cricket, AIR 2005, SC, AIR 1971, Prakash Chand Malviya AIR 2008, SC, AIR 1969, Federation of Hotel & Restaurant v. Union of India and Ors, AIR 1990, Sales Tax, U.P., Modi Sugar Mills Ltd., AIR 1961, Ahmedabad v. Ellis Bridge Gymkhana, AIR, SC, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Ors, State of Maharashtra and Ors, Mana Adim Jamat Mandal, a Criminal Court, Court, Court, Section 74;(f, Court, the Apex Court, the Court of law, Legislature, the Indian High Courts, Lordships, the Judicial Committee, Legislature, Lordships, AP, AP, AIR, AP, Chandra Sekhar Misra, the Courts of law.16, Court, CPC, Court, AIR 1971, Sections 35, Court, AIR 1971, AIR 1971 P&H, the Supreme Court, AIR, P&H, Vijay Choudhary (, Court, CPC, CPC, I.L. No, Trial

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 46, 12, 2, 2, 2, 17, 23, 1, 2, 17, 17, 1, four, 1, 2.10, two, 2, two, 2, 492, 592, 166, 2, 759, 2, 692, 4, 98.13, 35, 36, ten, five, ten, five, ten, one, two, one, two, one, 35, two, 2, 352, 132, 175, two, 26, 21, 4, 36, 4, 488, 488, 1, 4, 26, 17, 21, 4

FAC: the XIXth Additional District Judge

ORDINAL: second, first, second, first, first

PERSON: Jupadi Kesava Rao v. Pulavarthi, Venkata Subba Rao, S.C. Bagadia, Kapil Jain, Shekhar Sharma, Nos, A.M. Mathur, Ashok Lalwani, Abhinav Dhanodkar, B.L. Mehta, Bagadia, Mathur, Shekhar Sharma, Mathur, Mathur, follows:(a, Moran Mar Basselios, Catholicos, Anr, Mar Poulose, Hukumchand Mills, Anr, Netaji Cricket Club, Jupadi Kesava Rao v. Pulavarthi, Venkata Subba Rao, Agrawal, V. Venugopala Ravi Verma Rajah v. Union, Anr, Rai Ramkrishna, T.A. Qureshi, Shri Krishna Engg, Jupadi Kesava Rao, Bagadia, Bagadia, Vijay Krishna Mishra, Ram Ratan v. Parma Nand, Padmanabhaiah v. B. Lakshminarayana, Johanputra Reddi, T. Bhaskar Rao v. T. Gabriel, Chandra Das, Orissa, Bagadia, I.L. No, I.L. No, Jupadi Kesava Rao

DATE: 1899, 1899, 1954, 2004, 1094, 1637, 1047, 1998, 1963, 2007, 2005, 2006, 1898;(e, 14, 15, 36, 2009, 1946 PC 51, 1962, 1972, 1981, 1972, 1071, 1899.Sections 35 and 36, 1899, 1971, Para 13, 1872, a period of, three months, today

GPE: seriatim, it.12, India, Delhi, India, Paragraphs 13, India, evidence.15, Avinash, Sanjeeva, Reddi, Gobinda

PRODUCT: 120, 373

LOC: Paragraph 25

TIME: 9-9-2002, 9-9-02

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //