Sanjay Kumar Dubey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Decided On : Oct-12-2000

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: 'Reorganisation Act, the Reorganisation Act, the State Reorganisation Act, Chapter VII, Article 3 of the Constitution of India, The Reorganisation Act, the Reorganisation Act, The Reorganisation Act

GPE: Singh, India, Rajasthan, States, Bilaspur, Bilaspur, Sarguja, India, India, States, Chhattisgarh

ORG: State of Chhattisgarh, the M.P. State Reorganisation Act, State, The State of Madhya Pradesh, State, Central Provinces, Berar, State of Madhya Bharat, Sironj Sub-Division, State, the Union of India, State Reorganisation Commission, the State Reorganisation Commission, Supreme Court, State, the Union Government, State, the Congress Party, State, the State of M.P., State, State, Districts of Madhya Pradesh, Baster, State, the State and Union Government, Britishers, National interest.5, State, Naxalites, Secretariat, Office of Heads of Departments, Chhattisgarh, State, State, Court, State, State, Chhattisgarh State, State Legislative Assembly, State, Parliament, State, the Indian Parliament, Parliament, State, State, the State Legislature, Parliament, State of Chhattisgarh, State, State, Legislature, Parliament, State, State, Court, Court, State of Chhattisgarh

DATE: 2000, 2000, 2000, 1956, November 1, 1956, 1955, 1955, 1996, 2000, the past many decades, 2000, 2000, 2000, many years, November 1,2000

PERSON: Vindhya Pradesh, Smaller States, Larger States', Late Shri, Bhai Patel, Fazal Ali, H.N. Kunzuru, K.M. Pannikar, Lok Sabha, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Raipur, Bilaspur, Raipur, Durg, Raigarh, Vidhan Sabha, MLA Rest House, misconceptions.8

CARDINAL: 1-11-2000, six, three, six, One, hundreds

QUANTITY: thousands of miles, a few hundred miles