State of M.P. and anr. Vs. Anand Bihari and anr.

Decided On : Sep-28-1999

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Rule 3, Rule 3, Rule 3, Constitution

PERSON: S.P. Srivastava, Niyam, Samman Nidhi, Sangram Samman, Niyam, Chandra Dolai, Niyam, Niyam, aside.10, Anr, Prem Behari Khare, Keshwar Lal Chaudhuri, Rai, Anr, Raghunath Prasad

NORP: J.1, Rules

LOC: Single

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 10-3-1988, 10, 6, 8-3-1999.8, 6, 1, 6, 1247.16, 6, 294, 1711.22, 4, 227

ORG: the Madhya Pradesh Swatantrata Sangram Sainik, State, District Gwalior, Letters Patent Appeal, Govt, State, Swatantrata Sainik Samman, The State Government, the Madhya Pradesh Swatantrata, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Apex Court, Bhandari v. Union of India and Ors, AIR 1993 SC 2127, the Apex Court, Union of India, the Madhya Pradesh Swatantrata Sangram Sainik, the Madhya Pradesh Extraordinary Gazette, Swatantrata Sangram Sainik, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Mithilesh Kumari, AIR 1989, SC, the Apex Court, R.R. Reddy v. Padmini, AIR 1996, the Apex Court, Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu, The Motor & General Traders, AIR 1975 SC, Court, Tribunal, The Apex Court, Court, The Apex Court, Lachmeshwar Prasad Shukla, AIR 1941 FC 5, the Supreme Court, Patterson v. State of Alabama, Court, Lachmeshwar Prasad Shukla, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu, AIR 1981, SC, Kamleshwar Prasad v. Pradumanju Agarwal, SC, the Apex Court, the Civil Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the Apex Court, Mithilesh Kumari

DATE: 1972, 18-12-1991, 400/-per month, 1972, 1972, the year 1988, 1997, 1972, 1972, 1972, effect.11, 1409, 1934, 6007, 1997

GPE: Niyam, Mukundlal, Niyam, Niyam, the United States, US, L.Rs, JT

ORDINAL: first, happened.23

PRODUCT: 425, Articles 226