Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sunil @ Sonu Vs. Sarita Chawla (Smt.)

Decided On : Aug-31-2009

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 12, Section 23 of the Act, Section 29, Section 31, Section 31, Section 31, Section 31, Section 2 of the Act, Section 18 of the Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 18.Learned Counsel, Section 31, Section 28, Sections 12, Section 31 of the Act, Section 23 of the Act, Section 18 of the Act, Section 31, Section 18 of the Act, Section 37 of the Act, Section 12, Section 28 of the Act, Section 28, Section 12, Section 31

CARDINAL: 18-4-2009, 12-3-2009, one, three, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, three, 1, 1, 1, 1, 25,000/-, 22, 18-4-2009, 13, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 23, 1, 6, 1, 1, 2

ORG: Xth Additional Sessions, JMFC, the Protection of Women, Raviratan Apartment, Sourabh Hospital, Khajoori Bazar, Indore, Trial Court, Trial Court, Court, Shri P.M. Bapna, Trial Court, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Magistrate, Learned Counsel, Court, Learned Counsel, Trial Court, Court, Trial Court, the Appellate Court, Trial Court, Court, Court, Court, Trial Court

GPE: Cr, Ujjain, Jaipur, Counsel, Counsel, Cr

DATE: 162/2009, 1911/2009, two years, one week, 2,000/- per month, 2009, 18, 19, 21, 22, Form 11

WORK_OF_ART: Criminal Case No

PERSON: Shankar Chawla, Shankar Chawla, Prem Nagar, Ajmer

NORP: Hindu

LOC: the Central Govt

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //