Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Lauki Devi and ors. Vs. Sardar Gurlal Singh and ors.

Decided On : Sep-22-1986

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 30, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 6, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 6 of this Act, Section 6, the Limitation Act, Section 8(1, the Limitation Act, Section 7 of the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, Section 7, Section 7 de-hors, Section 29, Section 29 of the Act, Section 29(2, Section 29(2, Section 7, Section 29(2, Section 7 of the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 29, the Limitation Act, Section 29, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, Section 10A, Section 10B of the Act

PERSON: G.C. Gupta, Nos, Amarnath, MHG, Amarnath, Amarnath, Amarnath, Amarnath, Amarnath, Ex, Janardan, Pleader Durg, Virendra Brijbihari, Lalit Narain, Durg

NORP: J.1

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act

DATE: 1923, about 5 years, about 5 years, 2 years, another period of 5 years, 1973, 1971, 1046, 1964, 1978

CARDINAL: 31, 26/80, 27/80, 1, 28, 3, 12, about more than, 1, 2, two, 1, 2, 3, 1, 3, 1, 29, 1, 1, 2, 3, 389, 7, 1, 4 to 24, 189, 1974]3SCR31, 1, 1, 2

GPE: Workmen, Counsel, Chhotibai, Workmen, Vidyacharan

ORG: the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, Act, Amalcamated C.F. Ltd., Counsel though Section 29(2, Limitation Act, Learned Counsel, Workmen's Compensation, Section 115 C.P.C., Khubehand AlR, the Supreme Court, Abhimanyu, The Supreme Court, Hukumdev, Workmen's Compensation, dismissed.8, Act, Workmen's Compensation

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //