Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Lauki Devi and ors. Vs. Sardar Gurlal Singh and ors.
Decided On : Sep-22-1986
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Section 30, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 6, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 6 of this Act, Section 6, the Limitation Act, Section 8(1, the Limitation Act, Section 7 of the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, Section 7, Section 7 de-hors, Section 29, Section 29 of the Act, Section 29(2, Section 29(2, Section 7, Section 29(2, Section 7 of the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 29, the Limitation Act, Section 29, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, Section 10A, Section 10B of the Act
PERSON: G.C. Gupta, Nos, Amarnath, MHG, Amarnath, Amarnath, Amarnath, Amarnath, Amarnath, Ex, Janardan, Pleader Durg, Virendra Brijbihari, Lalit Narain, Durg
NORP: J.1
EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act
DATE: 1923, about 5 years, about 5 years, 2 years, another period of 5 years, 1973, 1971, 1046, 1964, 1978
CARDINAL: 31, 26/80, 27/80, 1, 28, 3, 12, about more than, 1, 2, two, 1, 2, 3, 1, 3, 1, 29, 1, 1, 2, 3, 389, 7, 1, 4 to 24, 189, 1974]3SCR31, 1, 1, 2
GPE: Workmen, Counsel, Chhotibai, Workmen, Vidyacharan
ORG: the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, Act, Amalcamated C.F. Ltd., Counsel though Section 29(2, Limitation Act, Learned Counsel, Workmen's Compensation, Section 115 C.P.C., Khubehand AlR, the Supreme Court, Abhimanyu, The Supreme Court, Hukumdev, Workmen's Compensation, dismissed.8, Act, Workmen's Compensation
ORDINAL: first