Anupama and ors. Vs. Laxmanrao and ors.

Decided On : Feb-23-1988

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd., Section 95, Section 95, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act 1939', Section 95, Section 95 of the Act, Section 95, Section 95 of the Act, Section 95 of the Act, Section 95 of the Act, Section 95, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act.28, Section 95 of the Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 95, the Motor Vehicles Act 1939, Section 95, Section II-Liability

ORG: P.D. Mulye, Ors, the Accident Claims Tribunal, M.A. No, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, the Indian Tourism Development Corporation, the Indian Tourism Development Corporation, the Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Corporation, Kishorechand Vyas, Smt, Tribunal, Kutch, The Indian Tourism Development Corporation, Tribunal, the Bharat Petroleum Corporation, the Insurance Company's, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Ors, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, ACJ 373 (Municipal Corporation, ACJ, K.L. Pasrija v. Oriental Fire, Co Ltd., ACJ 471, New India Assurance Co Ltd., Rajnish Chopra v., Shanta Nagpal, ACJ 46 (Mahipal Co-op, Society Ltd., Prabhati, Tribunal, the Tribunal in Para 36, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, AIR 1977 SC 1189, Tribunal, M/s, Maheshwari Transport Co., Tribunal, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, Counsel for the Insurance Company Shri A.K. Chitale, the Insurance Company, Company, the Insurance Policy 'Section II Liability, the Motor Vehicle', Counsel, the Insurance Company, Counsel for the Insurance Company, British Indian General Insurance Co. Ltd., ACJ, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., the Motor Vehicles Act, vehicle:(b, the Supreme Court, Motor Owners Insurance Co. Ltd., Court, the Insurance Company, Exhibit-A/14, the Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company, the 'Schedules of Rates', Insurance Agents, the Insurance Company, Ex-A-14, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Insurance Company, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., the Rajasthan High Court, the Insurance Company, Counsel for the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, The Insurance Company, the Rajasthan High Court, Counsel for the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Motor Vehicles Act, Tribunal, Company, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, the Tribunal for, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, the Insurance Company

NORP: J.1, Mandu, Suman

GPE: M.A., Anupama, Gujarat, Gandhidahm, Gujarat, Kishorechand, AIR1983MP24 Smt, Singh, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Clause, Singh, M.A., I.A.

CARDINAL: 33, 3, 1980.2, 25, 33, 3, 5,40,000.00, 18, 20,000.00, 1,25,000.00, 5,000.00, 50,000/-, 2,21,000/-, 18,000/-, 14, 1, 580, 125, 12, 1986]3SCR1095, 2, 307, 797, 233, 252, 507, 243, 152, 481, 394, 1, 12, seven, 8, 1,39,896, 10290.50, 15,000/-, 52,800/-, 41, 42, 1977]2SCR944, 280, 172, 157, 13,240/-, 15, 24-6-79, 50,000/-.23, one, 343, 946, 947, 1987]3SCR1149, 24, 1, one, fifty thousand, six, fifty thousand, fifty thousand, more than thirty, seventy-five thousand, more than thirty, more than sixty, one, more than sixty, ten thousand, five thousand, two thousand, 1, one, 2, six, 1982]1SCR860, one, 2, more than one, 2, 13, 15/-, 15, 198, two, two, 25, 82, 33, 82, 21, 33, 82

DATE: 1982, 12th, 82, 1982, 9187, the relevant day, 24 6-1979, 24-6-1979, 19-12-1979, 45 years, 3100/- per month, the age of 65 years, 2500/- per month, 2500/- per month, 6,90,000.007, 46 years, 1607/-, monthly, 65 years, the age of 58 years, 800/- per month, the eleven years, 1986, 1986, 1981, 1986, 1987, 1987, 1987, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1987, 1986, 1987, the age of 65 years, the age of 58 years, 1607/-, all per month, one month, 1943/- per month, the next six years, the next five years, 2,177/- per month, those five years, those 12 years, those 11 years, 400/- per month, those 11 years, 5000/-, a period of, 7 years, 1970, 1987, 1980, 1977, 1986, 1986, 1923, 8 of 1923, 1923, 1979, 1982, 1986, 1144, a period 37 months, 1986, two years, No 3263 of 1987, 2 years from 1986, one month

WORK_OF_ART: M.A. No

PERSON: Laxman Rao, Kishorechand Vyas, Kishorechand, Laxman Rao, Zhaver Ben, Laxman Rao, bus.8, Kashmiran Mathur, Sardar Rajendrasingh, Anr, 519 X., Chand Kanwar v. Mamaram, Teja v. Ram Ratan, Marvi Bai, Prem Chand Jain v., Dev Karan, Behari, Santrao Devi v. Pratap Singh, Inderjit Kaur, Punjab State, Ram Parkash, Kinta Suri, Charan Kaur, Hans Raj v. Neelam Chopra, Ran Singh, Jasmeet Kaur, Anani Ram, Bhagwan Singh, Savita Sharma v., J.N. Sharma, Mohan, Manjushri v. B.L. Gupta, Counsel Shri Samdhani, Pritam Kaur, Subject, of(i, Purshottam Udeshi v. M/s, Maya Banerjee, Laxmi Devi, M.K. Kunhimohammed v. P.A. Ahmedkutty, and(4, Keshavji Modi, Ex, Ram Adhin Singh v., Murari Lal Agrawal, Hans Raj v. Sukhdeo, Ex, Counsel

FAC: Rupmati Mahal

MONEY: 6 per cent, 15 per cent, 12 per cent, 6 per cent, 12 per cent

PRODUCT: 368, 376, 497, 435, M.P.S.R.T. Corporation

ORDINAL: third, third, third, third

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act

PERCENT: 12 percent