Smt. Anupama and ors. Vs. Laxman Rao and ors.

Decided On : Feb-23-1988

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co Ltd., Section 95, the Motor Vehicle Act, Section 95, Section 111(i, the Motor Vehicle Act, the Motor Vehicles Act 1939', Section 95oftheMotor Vehicles Act, Section 95 of the Act, Section 95, Section 95 of the Act, Section 95, the Motor Vehicle Act 1939', Section 95 of the Act, the Motor Vehicle Act, Section 95, the Motor Vehicle Act 1939, Section 95, the Motor Vehicle Act, Section II

ORG: P.D. Mulye, the Accident Claims Tribunal, the Insurance Company, CPF9187, the Indian Tourism Development Corporation, the Indian Tourism Development Corporation, the Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Corporation, Kishorechand Vyas, Tribunal, Kutch, The Indian Tourism Development Corporation, Tribunal, the Bharat Petroleum Corporation, the Insurance Company's, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Ors, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, A.C.J. 373 Municipal Corporation, AC, K.L. Pasrija v., A.C.J., A.C.J. 471, ACJ,243 New India Assurance Co. Ltd., ACJ, ACJ, ACJ, ACJ, ACJ, A.C.J. 46, Society Ltd., Prabhati, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, AIR 1977, Tribunal, Counsel Shri Sarudhani, ACJ, Suman v. The, Maheshwari Transport Co v., Tribunal, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, Counsel for the Insurance Company Shri A.K. Chitale, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Policy Ex, Company, the Insurance Policy 'Section II Liability, the Motor Vehicle', the Insurance Company, Counsel for the Insurance Company, ACJ, ACJ, British Indian General Insurance Co. Ltd., ACJ, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., AIR 1987, SC, AIR, the Supreme Court, Motor Owners Insurance Co. Ltd., Court, Court, the Insurance Company, Exhibit-A/14, the Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company Limited, the 'Schedules of Rates, Insurance Agents, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, the Motor Vehicle Act28, Insurance Company, ACJ, ACJ, ACJ, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., the Rajasthan High Court, the Insurance Company, Counsel for the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, The Insurance Company, the Rajasthan High Court, Counsel for the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, the Tribunal for, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, the Insurance Company

DATE: 1982, 12th, 82, 1982, the relevant day, 19.12.1979, 45 years, 3100/- per month, the age of 65 years, 2500/- per month, 16 years, 47 years, 1607/-by, monthly, 65 years, the age of 58 years, 800/- per month, the eleven years, 1986(1, Roadways 1987(1, 1987, 1987, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1987, 1986, 1987, 12.10.81.14, the age of 65 years, the age of 58 years, 1607/-, all per month, one month, 1943 per month, the next six years, the next five years, 2,177/- per month, those five years, those 12 years, those 11 years, those 11 years, 5000/-, a period of, 7 years, 1970, 1987, 1980AGJ, 1939, 1977, 1986, 1986, 1985, weekly, 1958, 1986, 1923, 8 of 1923, 1923, 50.000/-, 1979, 1982, 1986, 1144, 3 7 months, 1986, two years, 1987, 2 years from 1986, one month, today

GPE: Anupama, Dhar, Gandhidham, Gujarat, Kishorechand, AIR1983MP24 Smt, Singh, Delhi, Counsel, Counsel, Manjushri v. B.L Gupta, Counsel, Clause

NORP: October,81, Mandu

CARDINAL: 3, 1980.2, M.A.No.25, 24.6.79, 24.6.1979, 20,000.00For, 5,000.00For, 2,21,000/-, 18,000/-, 14, 1981ACJ 580 and 1986, 12, 1986]3SCR1095, 307, 797, 233, 152, 481, 368, 376, 497, 394, 1, 482, 36, seven, 10290.50, 5,000/-, 52,800/-, 400/-p.m, 41, 42, 1977]2SCR944, 20, 172, 157, 18,000/-, 13,240/-, 15%.21, 24.6.79, one, 343, 946, 947, 142, 2, 1, one, fifty thousand, six, fifty thousand, fifty thousand, more than thirty, more than thirty, more than sixty, one, more than sixty, ten thousand, five thousand, two thousand, 25, 1, one, 2, six, 1982]1SCR860, one, 2, more than one, 2, 15/-, 15, 198, 435, two, two, 82, 33, 82, 21.1.83, 33, 82

PERSON: Laxman Rao, Kutch Gujarat, Laxman Rao, Zhavcr Ben, Laxman Rao, bus.8, Kashmiran Mathur, Sardar Rajendra Singh, Anr, Shri, Chand Kanwar v. Mannaram, Teja v. Ram Ratan, Narvi Bai, Dev Karan, Behari, Devi v. Pratap Singh, Inderjeet Kaur, Ram Prakash, Kanta Suri, Charan Kaur, Neelam Chopra, Rajnish Chopra, Ran Singh, Jassmeet Kaur, Anant Ram, Shanta Nagpal, Bhagwan Singh, W.8 Mohan, M. P. S.R.T.C., Pritem Kaur, Prushottam Udeshi, Ranjil Gginning, Maya Banerjee, Laxmi Devi, M.K. Kunhimohammed v. P. A. Ahmedkutiy, and(4, Keshavji Modi, Ex, A-13, Ram Adhim Singh v., Murari Lal Agrawal, Hans Raj v. Sukkdev Singh, Ex, Counsel, I. A. N0.3263

FAC: Kishore Chand Vyas, Rupmati Mahal

LOC: Kishore Chand

PERCENT: 6%, 5%, 12%

MONEY: 15 per cent, 12 per cent, 12 per cent, seventy -five thousand

WORK_OF_ART: Oriental Fire and General Ins. Co. Ltd.

PRODUCT: M.P.S.RT.C.

ORDINAL: third, third, third, third

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act