Semantic Analysis by spaCy
M/S. P. Pal and Company Vs. State of M.P. and Another
Decided On : Apr-27-2001
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: the Arbitration Act, Rule 19, Rule 19, Rule 19, the Foreign Awards Act, Section 30(a
CARDINAL: 25, 16, 25, 2, 28, 17, 25-8-1990.3, 23,05,458.00, 1,94,600.00, 2,00,000.00, 4, 48,54,934.63.The, 19.03, 19,03,908.00, 1, 1,94,000.00, 1969.7, 19, 19, 36, 25, 19, 19, 26, 19, 12, 3, 19, 4, two, 19, One
ORG: Court, Sections 33, S. Pal & Co., Narmada, the Government of Madhya Pradesh, State Lotteries, State of Madhya Pradesh, Government of Madhya , Pradesh, Finance Department, Finance, S. Pal & Co., the State of Madhya Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, the M.P. State Lottery Rules, Slate Lotteries, State, the M.P. State Lottery Rules, the State of M.P., State, State Lotteries, the M.P. State Lottery Rules, State Lotteries, State, the M.P. State Lottery Rules, the M.P. State Lottery, Govt, Government, Treasury, M.P. Emporium, Calcutta, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., Court, AIR 1990 SC, the M.P. State Lottery Rules, B.V. Radhakrishna v. Sponge Iron India Limited, State, the Supreme Court, Continental Construction Co. Ltd., State of, Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1988 SC, the State Government, Renusagar Power Company v., General Electric Company, AIR 1988 SC 860, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, State, AIR 1975 SC, State, State, State, State, State, State, State
DATE: 15, 20-10-1983, 25-8-1990, 1969, 6-7-1980, 1969, 6-7-1980, 1996, 1969, 1973, 30 days, 1995, 1969, 1997, 1259
LOC: the District Judge
ORDINAL: Second, third
PERSON: Shri Pabir, Roy Choudhary, Shri N. Nagrath, Dandasi Sahu v. State, K.P. Poulose, Misc
GPE: Govt., Delhi, Orissa, Orissa, Kerala