Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/S. P. Pal and Company Vs. State of M.P. and Another

Decided On : Apr-27-2001

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: the Arbitration Act, Rule 19, Rule 19, Rule 19, the Foreign Awards Act, Section 30(a

CARDINAL: 25, 16, 25, 2, 28, 17, 25-8-1990.3, 23,05,458.00, 1,94,600.00, 2,00,000.00, 4, 48,54,934.63.The, 19.03, 19,03,908.00, 1, 1,94,000.00, 1969.7, 19, 19, 36, 25, 19, 19, 26, 19, 12, 3, 19, 4, two, 19, One

ORG: Court, Sections 33, S. Pal & Co., Narmada, the Government of Madhya Pradesh, State Lotteries, State of Madhya Pradesh, Government of Madhya , Pradesh, Finance Department, Finance, S. Pal & Co., the State of Madhya Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, the M.P. State Lottery Rules, Slate Lotteries, State, the M.P. State Lottery Rules, the State of M.P., State, State Lotteries, the M.P. State Lottery Rules, State Lotteries, State, the M.P. State Lottery Rules, the M.P. State Lottery, Govt, Government, Treasury, M.P. Emporium, Calcutta, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., Court, AIR 1990 SC, the M.P. State Lottery Rules, B.V. Radhakrishna v. Sponge Iron India Limited, State, the Supreme Court, Continental Construction Co. Ltd., State of, Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1988 SC, the State Government, Renusagar Power Company v., General Electric Company, AIR 1988 SC 860, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, State, AIR 1975 SC, State, State, State, State, State, State, State

DATE: 15, 20-10-1983, 25-8-1990, 1969, 6-7-1980, 1969, 6-7-1980, 1996, 1969, 1973, 30 days, 1995, 1969, 1997, 1259

LOC: the District Judge

ORDINAL: Second, third

PERSON: Shri Pabir, Roy Choudhary, Shri N. Nagrath, Dandasi Sahu v. State, K.P. Poulose, Misc

GPE: Govt., Delhi, Orissa, Orissa, Kerala

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //