Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Pohap Singh Bhamarsingh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Decided On : Jul-27-1960
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Section 514, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 105 and Section 107, Section 107, Section 514
PERSON: ORDERShiv Dayal, Bhind, Tejsingh, Pohap Singh, Tejsingh, Shri Nagarkar, and2, Bubai Manjhi, Ram Bilas, Mohan, AIR 1928 Cal 261, Mt. Taro v. The Crown AIR 1949, Taro, Harbilas
NORP: J.1
CARDINAL: 2000/-, 500/-, two, 119, three, 375, 221.In, 375, two, 1, 2, 1952, 2.7
DATE: June 22, 1959, the next date, June 23, the 29th April, June, 1953, 1953, 1953, 1953
ORG: Court, him.2, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Learned Counsel, State, Patna, Shinde, M.B., AIR, Magistrate, AIR 1928 Cal 261, AIR 1928 Cal 261, Dixit
ORDINAL: 2nd, first, second, first, second
GPE: Cri, L.J., L.J., Mt
PRODUCT: Calcutta