Hafiz Zakir HussaIn Vs. Akola Janta Commercial Co-operative Bank Ltd.

Decided On : Mar-10-2008

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 2, Section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, the 2002 Act', Article 226 of the Constitution of India the, the 2002 Act, Section 5, the Banking Regulations Act, the 2002 Act, the 2002 Act, Section 2(c)(v, the 2002 Act, the Full Bench, Section 56, Section 56, Section 56, Constitution, the Banking Regulations Act, Constitution, the 2002 Act, the 2002 Act, the Securitisation Act', Section 2(d, the Securitisation Act, Section 5, the BR Act, the BR Act, Section 2(c, Section 2(c)(v, Section 5(cci, the BR Act, Section 56, the BR Act, Section 56, the BR Act, the Securitisation Act, Section 2(c)(v, Section 5, Section 5, the BR Act by Act No. 23, Section 5(c, the BR Act, Section 5 of Act 23, Section 2(c)(v, Section 5(c)(cci, Section 2(c)(v

ORG: Dipak Misra, W.P. No, Block No. 31, The Akola Janta Commercial Cooperative Bank Ltd., Bank, Court, Bank, Bank, Madhya Pradesh and Ors, Greater Bombay Co-operative, Bank Ltd., United Yarn Tex, Ors, Brinks, the Bombay High Court, Khaja Industries, The State of Maharashtra and Ors, W.P. No, AIR 2008, NOC, AIR, the Division Bench, Court, Greater Bombay Co-operative, Bank Ltd., the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Greater Bombay Co-operative, Bank Ltd., the Apex Court, Banks and Financial Institutions, the Central Government, Bar, Court, Bank, the Division Bench of the Raj, Parliament, Include, the Bombay High Court, Shamrao Vithal Co-operative, Bank Ltd., the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, NOC, AP, Tribunal, Greater Bombay Co-operative, Bank Ltd., Maharashtra Co, the Andhra Pradesh Co-, the Multi-State Co-operative, Societies Act 2002, the Recovery of Debts Due to, the Central Legislation, Banks, Stales, Bank, Greater Bombay Cooperative Bank Ltd., Lordships, Parliament, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, Parliament, The Central Government, the Central Government by Notification, Parliament, Parliament, Bank, Parliament, Bank, Parliament, Parliament, the Central Government, the Central Government, the State Bank of India, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Bombay High Court, M/s. Khaja Industries, the Division Bench, Greater Bombay Co-operative, Bank Ltd., the Central Government, the Apex Court, the Central Government

NORP: J.1

DATE: 2005, 17 10 2007, 2621, 2002, 2006, 44, 2007, 1993, 31, 1993, 2003, 1949, 43,, 44, 1960, 1964, 2002, 1949, 1993, 45, 2002, 21st day of June, 2002, 1965, 2002, or(iii, 34, 59, 2002

LOC: Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge

CARDINAL: 18-6-2007, two, 3, 2672/07, 3, 5, 722, 30, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 30, 59, 205, 661, 10, 88, 89, 45, 32, 32, 30, 31, five, one, 28, 23, 28, three, 1965.31, 1965.9, 28, 30

MONEY: 2002 Act

EVENT: the 2002 Act, SC 1584, SC 1584, the 2002 Act, the 1993 Act, the 1993 Act, the 1993 Act, the 1949 Act, the 1949 Act, the 1993 Act, SC 1584, the 1993 Act, the 1993 Act, the 2002 Act, the 2002 Act

PERSON: Tarwala, Vipin Yadav, contentions:(a, Manoj Tarwala, Alok Aradhe, Manoj Tarwala, Justified, Yadav, Manoj Tarwala, Manoj Tarwala, Narendra Kantilal Shah AIR 2004 Bom 166, M. Babu Rao AIR 2005, Andhra Pradesh, Statutes, Vipin Yadav, Alok Aradhe, Manoj Tarwala

GPE: Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Clause, India, Clauses

QUANTITY: 2002 Act, 2002 Act

PRODUCT: Bench, the Full Bench of

ORDINAL: first, Seventh, firstly, secondly, thirdly

WORK_OF_ART: the Doctrine of Incorporation