Dulichand Gulsari Lal JaIn and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Sep-11-1996

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 69D, Section 69D of the Act, Section 69D.4, Section 69D, Section 69D, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 14 or 19(1)(g, the Constitution and Section 69D, Section 69D, Section 69D, Section 40A(3, Section 40A(3, Section 40A(3, Section 40A(3, Section 40A(3, Section 269SSof, Section 617, the Companies Act, the Banking Regulation Act, Section 51, the Banking Regulation Act, Article 14 or 19(1)(g

PERSON: A.K. Mathur, Rs.)1.Dr, Rajkumari Jain25-07-19781,0005.Smt, Champalal Jain23-08-19783,5006.Shri, Kallulal Mohanlal09-09-19783,5007.Shri, V.K. Tankha, V.K. Tankha, V.K. Tankha, U. P. Hardware Store, Attar Singh Gurmukh Singh v. ITO

DATE: 1961, the accounting year, 1977-78, year 1979-80, April 1, 1977, 1.1-07-1978, April 1, 1977, March 25, 1985, 1975, 1975, April 1, the previous year, the previous year, 1987, 1961, '11, the 30th day of June, 1984, 1956, 1 of 1956, 1987, April 1, 1989 :', 1949, 10 of 1949, 1949, 10 of 1949

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 5,000, 13.Shri, 51,000, 3,318, 54,318, 41, 1977.6, 2,500, 10,000, 1991]191ITR667(SC, 14, 19(1)(c, 672, 6DD, 1976]104ITR664(All, ten thousand, 13, 14, 1992]196ITR431(Mad

GPE: Diwali, Diwali, Jabalpur, Jhunnibai, Act.5, India, Sajowanlal

ORG: Sureshchand Jain, Santosh, KasturibaiShikerchand, Tribunal, the High Court, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, Explanation, Legislature, Legislature, Attar Singh Gurmukh Singh v., ITO, Lordships, Central, ProvincialAct, the Central Government, the Official Gazette :', the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, the Madras High Court, K.R.M.V. Ponnuswamy Nadar Sons, Union of India, Legislature

NORP: Jawaharganj,10

PRODUCT: Khokas, Section 269SS

ORDINAL: second, second

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India