Ram Khiladi Gurjar Vs. State of M.P. and anr. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Apr-16-2008

Court: Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, the National Section Act, Article 21 of the Constitution, Section 3 of the Act of, Section 3 of the Prevention of Black-marketing, Section 8, Paragraphs 10 and, Section 3 of the Act of

NORP: Sharma, J.1, French, French, Maharashtra

ORDINAL: 7th, first

DATE: September, 2007, 19th July, 2007, 1980, 1980, 21st July, 2007, 21st July, 2007, the year 2003, the year 2003, 14-10-2003, the year 2003, only 18th May, 2007, 1st July, 2007, 3rd July, 2007, 3rd July, 2007, 1980, 1980, 1980, 13th August, 2007, 1980, 1980, 1980, 7 of 1980, three months, three months, more than twelve days, five days, later than ten days, twelve days', fifteen days', seven days, 1995, 18th May, 2007, 1981, the year 2003, 18th May, 2007, 3rd July, 2007, 2003, 1980, the year 2003, the year 2003, 1980, 3rd July, 2007, this petition.12, Para 5, 1980, 1980, 1980

CARDINAL: 1, one, twenty one, only three, 336/03, one, 158/07, 294, 507, 347, one, 21, 13, two, 1, 1, 2, one, 3, as many as 21, one, 11/13, 20, 13, only three, 347, 2004CriLJ4600, three, One, two, 1970CriLJ852, 1970CriLJ1136, 1972CriLJ482, twenty one, 21, 2004)7SCC467, 2004CriLJ1426, 9,11,12,13, two, one, 1966CriLJ608, 1974CriLJ395, 1974CriLJ917, one, two, 1975CriLJ543, 1992CriLJ769, 2000CriLJ2286, 1980CriLJ793, 21

ORG: State of Madhya Pradesh, the District Magistrate, Sections 302,341,120B of, IPC, IPC, Ex-M.L.A., the Competent Authority, Backward Class Community, the District Magistrate, State, Govt, the State Government, the State Government, the Advisory Board, The Advisory Board, the Advisory Board, State, the State Government, the District Magistrate, the State Government, The Central Government, the State Government may,:(a, The Central Government, the State Government, State, Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, District Magistrate, the State Government, District Magistrate, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, substituted.(5, the State Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the State Government, Sections 392 of, IPC, the Madhya Pradesh, IPC, The Apex Court, State, U.P., State, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, the District Magistrate, Gwalior, Court, The Apex Court, Executive, the Executive Authority, the Detaining Authority, The Detaining Authority, State, Union of India, the District Magistrate, the Apex Court, State, Court, State, State, The State of Bihar and Ors, the Apex Court, Court, the Detaining Authority, the District Magistrate, Court, the Apex Court, Court, the District Magistrate, Gwalior, The State Government, the District Magistrate, Gwalior, The Advisory Board, the District Magistrate

PRODUCT: P-3

PERSON: Ram Khiladi, Rakesh Shukla, Rakesh Shukla, Act.(3, Kshetra Adhiniyam, Sanjai Pratap Gupta, Public Order', Kishori Mohan Bern, Pushkar Mukherjee v. State, Arun Ghosh v. State, Nagendra Nath Mondal v. State, C. Anita, Thomas Jefferson ', Lal Manchanda, Anr, Paragraphs 8, Kanu Biswas, Disorder, Ram Manohar Lohia, Aran Ghosh's, Babul Mitra, Anil Mitra v. State, Milan Banik v. State, Law, Kuso Sah, Harpreet Kaur v. State, T.K Gopal v. State, Mohd

GPE: Morena, India, India, India, India, India, impact.10, Karnataka

FAC: Sanjai Pratap Gupta