Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. H.H. Lokendra Singh
Decided On : Jan-23-1996
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Section 80, Section 256(1, Section 256(2, Section 45 of the Act, Section 45 of the Act, the Finance Act
PERSON: A.R. Tiwari, Lokendra Bhawan', Bhawan, Durgajyoti Palace, Shri D. D. Vyas, H. H. Lokendrasinghji, B. C. Srinivasa, Chunilal Prabhudas, Jagdev Singh Mumick v., E. C. Jacob, Michel Postel, Jaswantlal Dayabhai, K. N. Daftary v., B. C. Srinivasa
CARDINAL: 1, 131, 2, 3., 1,42,836, 1,21,850, 56,880, 42,660, 131, 4., 5, 93, 236, 93, 236, 6, 1981]128ITR294(SC, 301, 1969]71ITR433(Mad, 1970]76ITR566(Cal, 1971]81ITR500(Delhi, 1973]89ITR88(Ker, 1977]107ITR609(Bom, 1978]112ITR315(Bom, 1978]114ITR798(MP, 91, 393, 1977]106ITR998(Cal, 8, 1977]107ITR609(Bom, 1981]128ITR294(SC, 9, 1, 54, 10, 11, 12, 750, 13
DATE: August 2, 1988, 1987, the year 1976-77, The previous year ended on March 31, 1976, the previous year, April 17, 1979, 1987, August 2, 1988, 1981, 1977-78, March 1, 1982, the assessment year 1977-78, 1981, 1981, March 1, 1982, 1973, 1964, April 1, 1964, ' 45, the previous year, 53, 54, 54B, 54E, 54F, the previous year, 1,03,609
WORK_OF_ART: Miscellaneous Civil Case No
ORG: Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, State, the Department to Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, CIT, the Calcutta High Court, CIT, the Delhi High Court, CIT, the Bombay High Court, CIT v. Home Industries and Co., CIT, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, CIT, the Gujarat High Court, CIT, Mohanbhai Pamabhai, ITR, the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, the Bombay High Court, CIT v. Home Industries and Co., the Supreme Court, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal
MONEY: 50 per cent, 25 per cent, 50 per cent
GPE: I.T.A. Nos, assessee, I.T.A. Nos, Sections
ORDINAL: first