Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. H.H. Lokendra Singh

Decided On : Jan-23-1996

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 80, Section 256(1, Section 256(2, Section 45 of the Act, Section 45 of the Act, the Finance Act

PERSON: A.R. Tiwari, Lokendra Bhawan', Bhawan, Durgajyoti Palace, Shri D. D. Vyas, H. H. Lokendrasinghji, B. C. Srinivasa, Chunilal Prabhudas, Jagdev Singh Mumick v., E. C. Jacob, Michel Postel, Jaswantlal Dayabhai, K. N. Daftary v., B. C. Srinivasa

CARDINAL: 1, 131, 2, 3., 1,42,836, 1,21,850, 56,880, 42,660, 131, 4., 5, 93, 236, 93, 236, 6, 1981]128ITR294(SC, 301, 1969]71ITR433(Mad, 1970]76ITR566(Cal, 1971]81ITR500(Delhi, 1973]89ITR88(Ker, 1977]107ITR609(Bom, 1978]112ITR315(Bom, 1978]114ITR798(MP, 91, 393, 1977]106ITR998(Cal, 8, 1977]107ITR609(Bom, 1981]128ITR294(SC, 9, 1, 54, 10, 11, 12, 750, 13

DATE: August 2, 1988, 1987, the year 1976-77, The previous year ended on March 31, 1976, the previous year, April 17, 1979, 1987, August 2, 1988, 1981, 1977-78, March 1, 1982, the assessment year 1977-78, 1981, 1981, March 1, 1982, 1973, 1964, April 1, 1964, ' 45, the previous year, 53, 54, 54B, 54E, 54F, the previous year, 1,03,609

WORK_OF_ART: Miscellaneous Civil Case No

ORG: Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, State, the Department to Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, CIT, the Calcutta High Court, CIT, the Delhi High Court, CIT, the Bombay High Court, CIT v. Home Industries and Co., CIT, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, CIT, the Gujarat High Court, CIT, Mohanbhai Pamabhai, ITR, the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, the Bombay High Court, CIT v. Home Industries and Co., the Supreme Court, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal

MONEY: 50 per cent, 25 per cent, 50 per cent

GPE: I.T.A. Nos, assessee, I.T.A. Nos, Sections

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //