Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gauri Shanker Surajmal and ors. Vs. Moolchand Pannalal and ors.

Decided On : Apr-26-1958

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 2(4, the Indian Sale of Goods Act,'Any

PERSON: H.R. Krishnan, Rustum Khan, Rustam Khan, Rustam Khan, Rustam Khan, Rustam Khan, Nos, bailee, Rustam Khan, Seth Surajmalji, Seth Surajmalji, Laxminarayan Balmukund, Abdul Shakur v., Gajadhar Prasad v. Rishabkumar, Dhian Singh v. Union of India

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3).2, 3, 800, 1, 23-4-1950, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 800, 1, 2, 1, 1, 800, 1, 2, 8, 186, 3, 1, 2, 4/-per, 3-8, 2, 1, 2

ORG: Arhtias, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, contract5, Bhai Moolchandji Nemichandji, koyala)', Court, Motiram Premji, Court, AIR 1949 Nag 319, AIR 1958, SC 274, Ruthia

ORDINAL: Secondly, first, first, second

DATE: 1,845/-, 30-5-1950, last year, 1944, 1949, a few weeks earlier

FAC: Gulabchand Sitaram v.

GPE: Delhi

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //