Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Precious Industries Vs. Collector of Customs

Decided On : Jun-30-1989

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: the Customs Tariff Act, Order No, Chapter 48, the Customs Tariff Act, Item 17, Item 68, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Item 17(2, Tariff Item 68, Chapter 48, the Customs Tariff Act, Tariff Item 17, Tariff Item, the Customs Tariff Act, the Bill of Entry, Chapter 48, the Customs Tariff Act, Item 17(2, Chapter 49, Chapter 49, Chapter 48, the Customs Tariff Act, Tariff Item 17(2, Tariff Item, Tariff Item 68, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Chapter 48, the Customs Tariff Act, Item 68, Tariff Item 68, Tariff Item 17(2, Tariff Item 68

CARDINAL: 1, 26, 48, 17(2, 4/6, 2, 293/30, at least one, 303/83, 303/83, 24-6-1983, 31, 24, 542, 42, 6, 31, 133, 141, 17, two, one, two, two, one, 24, 542, 9, 17(2, 17(2, 42, 129, 131, 39, 11, 15, 8, 15, 41 to 43, two, one, 24, two, 1-3-1978, 17(2, 48, 16, 389, 11, 17(1, one, 17(1, 17(2, 3, 137, 131, 4811.31, 2, 3, 4)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------48.01/, 2, 1000, less than, 3, 16B, 39.01/06 11, 2, 45 to 47, 48.03, 48.07, two, 48.01, 48.07, 1, 48.07 - Paper and, one, 8, 12, 3, 4, 3, two, 4., 13, two, one, 1, 2, 232, 6, four, 15, 17(2, 17(2, 17(2, 17, 17, 2, 1, two, thousand and five, hundred, 2, 2, 1, 3, Seventy-five, 1, one, 1, 17, 26

DATE: 1975, 1st March, 1978, 1458, 1st March, 1978, 1975, 1st March, 1978, 1st March, 1978, 1st March, 1978, 25th May, 1971, 19th and 20th December, 1988, 18th April, 1989, 24th April, 1989, 1987, 73, 15/18-5-1985 -, 377/85, 18-5-1985 - Sunrise Elec. Corporation, 1986, 13th Feb., 1985, 1987, 73, 1983, 2465, 16th April, 1985, 15/18-5-1985, 1986, 13th February, 1985, 1271-1958, para 2.2.1, 1271-1958, 1271-1958, 1st September, 1978 Rule 3(c, 377/85, 18-5-1985, 1986, 1984, 15th May, 1985, 1975, 1978, 1978, 1978, 39, 16B 1721, 1975, 1983, 1762D, 1975, 1977, 1988, 48, 1975, 1st March, 1978

ORG: Customs, Central Excise Tariff, CET, Department, Department, Precious Industries, Bombay, Hapag Lloyd Express, the Collector of Customs (Appeals, the Collector of Customs (Appeals, Collector of Customs (Appeals, Tribunal, Collector (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, CET, CTA, Central Excise Tariff, CTA, CET, Advocate, M/s. Precious Industries, Bench, Advocate, Registry, JDR, the Tribunal :- (, SawantwadiSunrise Electricals v. Collector of CustomsM.C. Mody &, C-372, C.C.E., Hyderabad, Uma Laminated Products P. Ltd., C - Crompton Greaves Ltd., JDR, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Mody &, CC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, JDR, the Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, JDR, Tribunal, Solar Elec., CC, Tribunal, JDR, Guardian Plasticote Ltd., CCE, Calcutta, Tribunal, Department, the Central Excise Tariff, Tribunal, Raja Radios Co., Tribunal, Heading 39.01/06 CTA, CET, CTA, Polyethylene, Advocate, 7 &, Interpretatory Rules, the Interpretatory Rules, the Interpretatory Rules, Sunrise Elec.Corporation, Interpretatory Rule 3(b, Interpretatory Rule 4, Guardian Plasticote Ltd., CCE, Calcutta, Tribunal, CV, Entremonde Polycoaters Pvt. Ltd., Nasik v. CCE, 10 &amp, Tribunal, CET, Tribunal, Solar Electric Trading Co., Collector of Customs, JDR, CV, JDR, the Interpretatory Rules, Tribunal, Interpretatory Rule 3(b, Tribunal, Tribunal, Interpretatory Rule 3(b, the Brussels Nomenclature, Paperboard, Articles of Paper Pulp, Paperboard, Paperboard, Interpretatory Rules, the First Schedule, Headings, Headings, the Interpretatory Rule 3(b, Interpretative Rule 3(b, Interpretative Rule 3(b, Tribunal, Sunrise Electric Corporation, Tribunal, Heading 39.01/06 CTA, Basic Customs Duty.14, The Australian Tribunal, Customs, Levy, Valuation &, Classification, CTA, CET, CC, Shashi Electricals, Shashi Electricals, Tribunal, CV Duty, CET, Shri A.S. Sunder Rajan, JDR, CET, CV, Tariff Items, Paper Board, alkyds, Interpretatory Rule 3(b, Central Excise Tariff, Importers, JDR, Advocate, CET, CET

GPE: C.C., Bombay, Bombay, A.S., Bombay, Bros., C.C., Bombay, C.C., Bombay, C.C., Bombay, C.C., Bombay, Bombay, C.C., Yash Udyog, Bombay, Bros., Bombay, Bombay, CV, the Yash Udyog, CV, Bombay, Bombay, CV, Bombay, Yash Udyog, Bombay, valorem, valorem, valorem, CV, CV

WORK_OF_ART: the Memorandum of Appeal, Interpretatory Rule 3(c, the Larger Bench of the Tribunal, Edition

PERSON: S.D. Nankani, S.D. Nankani, S.D. Nankani, Yash Udyog, Order Nos, Shri Sunder Rajan, knwon, Rajan, S.D. Nankani, S.D. Nankani, Shri Nankani, Shri Nankani, Shri Nankani, Shri Nankani, Schedule, Shri Nankani, Shri Nankani, Shri Nankani, Shri Nankani, Shri Nankani, Shri Sunder Rajan, products,39.07 Articles, Mixtures, Schedule, Shri V J. Taraporevala, CC Bombay, CV, Shri Sunder Rajan, Shri Nankani

PRODUCT: Memorandum, F, Centigrade, Notes, ALD 84, Bench

QUANTITY: 600 mm, 800 mm ', 15 cm

NORP: Indian

LOC: Ch, Pune

PERCENT: 40%, 60%, 200%, 100%

ORDINAL: second

MONEY: Ten per cent, Fifty per cent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //