Abdul Majid Vs. Income-tax Officer and ors.

Decided On : Feb-24-1989

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 148, Section 147 of the Act, Section 148, Section 147, Section 148, Section 132 of the Act, Section 148, Section 147, Section 148, Section 147, Section 148, Section 148, Section 148, Section 34 of the Act of, Section 147 of the Act of 1961, Section 148, Section 148, Section 148, Section 148, Section 148, Section 147, Section 16A(1

PERSON: A.G. Qureshi, Abdul Razzaq v. ITO, M. P. No, Mohammad Munaf v. ITO, M. P. No, M. P. No, Noor Mohammad v. ITO, Al, Siyaganj, Shri G.M. Chaphekar, Shri Chaphekar, hereinafter.10, Lokendra Singh Rathore v., Haji Abdul Gaffar v., Shri Mukati, Biswanath Pasari v., Shri Mukati, Chhatrshal Sinhji D. Zala, Chhatrshal Sinhji D. Zala, Shri Mukati, differ.22, Lokendra Singh Rathore v., Haji Abdul Gaffar v., Ramdas Prabhu, Madhya Pradesh

NORP: J.1, Income.-tax, Punjab

CARDINAL: 519, 520, 521, 522, five, five, 12, one, 7,45,000, 1,49,000, 24,000, 24,000, 1,01,000, 1,49,000, C2, 1, 1, 1, 1, two, 12, 96, 12,05,000, 7,26,400, two, 1976]103ITR437(SC, one, 1983]144ITR180(MP, 1985]153ITR466(MP, 1983]144ITR180(MP, 1985]154ITR1(MP, 1973]91ITR261(Mad, two, one, 1985]154ITR419(Cal, 1982]135ITR826(Guj, 1982]135ITR826(Guj, two, 1,975, 226.18, 5, 510, 2,485, one, 1983]144ITR180(MP, 1985]153ITR466(MP, 1985]154ITR1(MP, 1987]166ITR706(KAR

DATE: 1987, 1987, 1987, 1987, the last several years, years 1982-83, 1983-84, 1984-85, years 1975-76, 1976-77, the month of August, 1980, March, 1983, year, years 1981-82, 1983-84, the year 1981-82, the year 1982-83, the year 1983-84, the three assessment years, January 12, 1987, March 10, 1987, 1961, years 1982-83, the relevant years, March 30, 1987, years 1981-82, 1982-83, 1983-84, 1982-83, 1983-84, 1961, the particular year, 1922, 1948, '11, that year, the early years, the subsequent year, years, the assessment years, that year, more than three years, 1957

ORG: ITO, D.N. Nayate, the Department Valuer, the Departmental Valuer, the Departmental Valuer, The Departmental Valuation Officer, the Departmental Valuer, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Supreme Court, the Departmental Valuer, Department, Supreme Court, ITO, the Supreme Court, the Departmental Valuer, Prabha Rajya Lakshmi, WTO, Department, WTO, Prabha Rajya Lakshmi, this High Court, ITO, Departmental, Thanthi Trust, ITO, Shri Mukati, the Departmental Valuer, the Departmental Valuer, Shri Mukati, ITO, the Calcutta High Court, Haryana High Court, Ranbir Engineering Mills Store v., ITO, CWT, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Gujarat High Court, CWT, the Departmental Valuer, the Departmental Valuer, the Departmental Valuer, the Departmental Valuer, the Departmental Valuer, Prabha Rajya Lakshmi, WTO, WTO, ITO, the Departmental Valuer, WTO, the High Courts of Calcutta, the Departmental Valuer

GPE: A2, Daulatganj, Act.5, Daulatganj, Delhi, Smt, Smt, K.R.

MONEY: 20 per cent, 20 per cent, 183.48 sq. metres

PRODUCT: F, F, F, F, F

ORDINAL: first, First

QUANTITY: 226.18 sq. metres

LOC: Departmental Valuer