Rajneesh Kumar Dwivedi Vs. K.P. Enterprises and anr.

Decided On : Feb-19-2008

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 30, WC Act Non, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, Section 2(1)(g, Section 4, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, Section 4A(3, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4(1)(b, Section 19 of the Act, Section 4(1, Section 4(1, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, Act 22, The Explanation II of Section 4(1)(c

ORG: ORDER1, Workmen's Compensation, Labour Court, Rajneesh Kumar Dwivedi, Jeep, Jeep, M/s. K.P. Enterprises or Kamal Transport, Tribunal, Court:(i, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Tribunal, context:(g, Schedule IV, Schedule I.Clause, The Apex Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., the High Court, the High Court's, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Workmen's Compensation, Court, QMP, QMP, QMP, QMP, QMP, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Sharma v. Union of India, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Court, Court, Reliance, the Apex Court, MPSRT Corporation, FLR 460, Court, J.C. Mills v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Gwalior, Court, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Supp, Orissa High Court, Karnataka High Court, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Bharat Yadav, Calcutta High Court, Workmen's Compensation, Tribunal, Section 4A, Tribunal, Section 4A

EVENT: Workmen's Compensation Act

DATE: 1923, 15 per day, 1923, monthly, years, monthly, monthly, monthly, 1995, 1984, 1991, 1985, 1988, 1987, monthly, monthly, 2450, 1470 per month, the age of 30 years, five thousand seven hundred, one month, five thousand seven hundred, one month

CARDINAL: 22-8-2005, 2,000, 15, 2,000, 1, 5, 2(1)(i, 1, II, 1, 1, ninety thousand, four thousand, four thousand, II, 1, ninety thousand, 1, II, II, 2007)ILLJ1035SC, more than one, 2004(5)KarLJ7, two, three, 1, II, 373, 56, 1976)ILLJ235SC, 222, 56, 281, 1997(III, 128, 2002)IIILLJ97Cal, 207.98, 3,05,730.60, Three, 3,05,730.60, Three

PERSON: Satna, Satna, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Mubasir Ahmed, Anr, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule I. Explanation, Anr, Subhas, R.V. Raveendran, J., Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Shivalinga Shivanagowda Patil v., Erappa Basappa Bhavihala, Anr, Subhas, follows:(a, practitioner'.(b, Shankarlal, Central Railway, Anr, Shrinivas Sabata, Jabbar Khan, Khan v. Kamal Sethi, Anr, Schedule, Surendra Kumar Sendha, Anr, Erappa Basappa Bhavihala, Anr, Schedule, V.K. Panse, Virendra Verma

GPE: Jabalpur, factor;oran, Sreedharan, Kerala, Babu, Shivalinga, Shivanagowda, appellant.12

PERCENT: 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 60%, 60%, 12%, 12%

MONEY: one hundred per cent, sixty per cent, one hundred per cent, 100 per cent, 100 per cent, 100 per cent, sixty per cent

ORDINAL: second, first, second, First

FAC: Pratap Narain Singh Deo v.

QUANTITY: 3 inches