Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ladli Saran Sinha

Decided On : Apr-24-1958

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution in the Court of the Judicial, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311(2, Constitution, Rule 49, the Penal Code, Article 311(2, the Constitution and Rule 55, the Indian Penal Code, Rule 55, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Rule 55, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, the Penal Code, the Penal Code, the Penal Code, the Penal Code, Article 311, Constitution, the Penal Code, Article 311, Article 311(2, Constitution, Section 29, Section 342/161 I. P. C., the Penal Code, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Article V and, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Constitution, Rule 49, Rule 49, the Code of Civil Procedure

ORG: P.V. Dixit, Bhopal State, the Home Department, the Bhopal Government, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal) Rules, Nirmal Kumari, the Bhopal Government, Government, Government, the Court of the First Sub-Judge, the Government of Bhopal, Court, Nirmal, the Civil Service (, Control and Appeal, the Civil Service (, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Court of the District Judge, Court, Court, the Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal, Government Advocate, State, the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, Judicial, Government, Judicial, Judicial, the Civil Service (, Control and Appeal) Rules, Court, Government, Court, Court, Government, Court, Court, Nirmal Kumari, Magistrate, Court, Nirmal Kumari, Government Advocate, Government, Government, Court, High Courts, the Supreme Court, Khemchand v. Union of India, AIR 1958, SC, Civil, the Privy Council, AIR 1958, SC, the Supreme Court, Government, the Supreme Court, AIR 1958, SC, the Civil Service (, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Bhopal Government

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 14, one, one, 6, 4, 5., one, 6., 2, 2, 121, 18, four, 9, 31, 32, 10

PERSON: Bhopal State, Ladli Saran, Nirmala Kumari, Ladli Saran, Ladli Saran, Ladli Saran, Ladli Saran, Kumari Nirmala, Shri Har Narain, Ladli Saran, Kumari Nirmala, Ladli Saran, Ladli Saran, Ladli Saran, Ladli Saran, Ladli Saran, Ladli Saran, Ladli Saran, Nirmala Kumari, Sharma, Nirmala Kumari, Nirmala Kumari, Bhugiram v. Superintendent of Police, Sibsagar AIR, Assam, Assam, Assam, I. M. Lall, Vindhya Pradesh

DATE: 1948, ' August 1952, 21-8-1952, 24-9-1952, 21st August 1952, 19th November 1952, 21st August 1952, 8th December 1952, 21st August 1952, 8th December 1952, 9th December, 1952, 12th December 1952, 24th April 1953, 1954, 9-12-1952, ' 8, 1950

FAC: the Laxmi Talkies

ORDINAL: first, first, second, second, second

GPE: Bhopal, India, The Learned District

PRODUCT: 300, 300, 300

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //