Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Asha Choudhary Vs. Rajesh Kumar

Decided On : Feb-28-1992

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Order 43 Rule l(d, Section 28, the Hindu Marriage Act, Order 9 Rule 13, Order 5 Rule20, whyOrder 5 Rule 2, Order 5 Rule, Article 123 of the Limitation Act, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, Order 9Rule 9, Section 5, the Limitaion Act, Order 9 Rule 13, Order 9

PERSON: S.K. Dubey, Misc, Shri S.S. SamvatsarCounsel, Counsel, Sushila Bai, Ram Nihore, Prasad Patel, J.B. Shrivastave.12, Nanda Dayaram, notnoticed.15

NORP: J.1

ORG: Civil Procedure, C.P.C, ia) &, C.P.C. the Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, The Trial Court, Shri R.S. Kochatta, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Mohanlal Brijlal Partnership Firm v., MPWN, Kranti Kumar Jha, Court, Rajaram, Court, Court, Court, Collector, Land Acquisition, Ananinag, AIR 1987, Court, Court, Order, theCourt, Trial Court, theTrial Court, Trial Court, Court, Trial Court

CARDINAL: 24.10.89, 24, 1-A, 22,1.1987was, 22.1.87, 28.1.87, 28.1.87, 28.2.87, 13.3.87, 22, 13.3.87, 19.3.87, 9, 13, 9, 13, 9, 330.11, 22.1.87, 329, 39, 443, 1, 13, six, one, 13, 24-A/86

DATE: 7/1987, 19.3.1987, 22.1.87, 30 days, 1989, 22.1.1987, 1991, 1986, 1978, aholiday, that day, 30 days, 1353, 25.3.1992, a period of, six months, 25.3.1992

GPE: Civil, C.P.C., Counsel, follow.10, Smt, Chhutbai, Manga, C.P.C., C.P.C., Civil

MONEY: 261

PRODUCT: 0.9 Rule 13C.P.C.16

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //