Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Asha Choudhary Vs. Rajesh Kumar
Decided On : Feb-28-1992
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Order 43 Rule l(d, Section 28, the Hindu Marriage Act, Order 9 Rule 13, Order 5 Rule20, whyOrder 5 Rule 2, Order 5 Rule, Article 123 of the Limitation Act, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, Order 9Rule 9, Section 5, the Limitaion Act, Order 9 Rule 13, Order 9
PERSON: S.K. Dubey, Misc, Shri S.S. SamvatsarCounsel, Counsel, Sushila Bai, Ram Nihore, Prasad Patel, J.B. Shrivastave.12, Nanda Dayaram, notnoticed.15
NORP: J.1
ORG: Civil Procedure, C.P.C, ia) &, C.P.C. the Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, The Trial Court, Shri R.S. Kochatta, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Mohanlal Brijlal Partnership Firm v., MPWN, Kranti Kumar Jha, Court, Rajaram, Court, Court, Court, Collector, Land Acquisition, Ananinag, AIR 1987, Court, Court, Order, theCourt, Trial Court, theTrial Court, Trial Court, Court, Trial Court
CARDINAL: 24.10.89, 24, 1-A, 22,1.1987was, 22.1.87, 28.1.87, 28.1.87, 28.2.87, 13.3.87, 22, 13.3.87, 19.3.87, 9, 13, 9, 13, 9, 330.11, 22.1.87, 329, 39, 443, 1, 13, six, one, 13, 24-A/86
DATE: 7/1987, 19.3.1987, 22.1.87, 30 days, 1989, 22.1.1987, 1991, 1986, 1978, aholiday, that day, 30 days, 1353, 25.3.1992, a period of, six months, 25.3.1992
GPE: Civil, C.P.C., Counsel, follow.10, Smt, Chhutbai, Manga, C.P.C., C.P.C., Civil
MONEY: 261
PRODUCT: 0.9 Rule 13C.P.C.16