Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Balchand Hashmatrai and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Decided On : Nov-02-1985
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Section 256(1, Section 36(1)(iii, Section 139(1, Section 40(b, Section 40(b, Section 40(b, Section 40(b, Section 40(b, Section 40(b, Section 40(b, Section 40(b, Section 40(b, Section 64(2, Section 40(b, Section 40(b, Section 40(b
ORG: P.D. Mulye, Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore, Appellate, Tribunal, Hashmatrai, CIT, CIT, London Machinery Co., Tribunal, Sajjanraj Divanchand, CIT, the Gujarat High Court, Chhotalal & Co., CIT, CIT, CIT, Department, the Supreme Court of India, CIT, Pannalal Hiralal & Co., Tribunal, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, CIT, London Machinery Co., Jalam Chand Mangilal, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, Department
NORP: J.1, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu
DATE: 1961, 1961?'2, The previous year, 1976-77, March 31, 1976, July 26, 1976, 73,410.3, April 1, 1970, the assessment year 1974-75, 1980, the assessment year 1974-75, 1980, 1980, the relevant year, 1980, 1980, 1983, 1970, April 1, 1971, the 31st day of December, 1969, the 1st day of April, 1971,--, 1984, April 1, 1985, April 1, 1985
CARDINAL: 4,234, 51,000, 4,234, 73,493.4, 51,000, 126, 1979]117ITR111(All, 8, 126, 654, 126, 654, 654, 655):'There, two, 7,777, 7,777, 1984]150ITR276(Guj, 126, 654, 126, 654, 15, 144, 1984]146ITR549(Bom, 15, 1979]117ITR111(All, 2, 1982]138ITR347(MP, 16, 2.--Where, 18
PERSON: Hashmatrai Balchand, Shri Hashmatrai, Explanation 2
ORDINAL: second
GPE: Sajjanraj Divanchand, Sajjanraj Divanchand, pp, Sajjanraj Divanchand, Sajjanraj Divanchand, case.19