Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shree Synthetics Limited
Decided On : Nov-04-1985
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Section 256(1, Section 37(2B, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 37(2B, Section 35D(1, Section 35D(2)(c)(iv, Section 35D(1, Section 35D, Section 35D, the Finance Act, Section 35D(2)(c)(iv, the Companies Act
ORG: P.D. Mulye, Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Lohia Machines Ltd., Union of India, Department, Department, him.4, Appellate, Appellate, CIT, ITR, Tribunal, Appellate, Underwritingcommission4,81,250(3, Appellate, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Section 35D, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Appellate, CIT, ITR, CIT, CIT, Central Paints Ltd., CIT, CIT, Tribunal, CIT, CST, Modi Sugar Mills Ltd., Interpretation of Statutes, Tribunal, Margarine Works, AC 175, Interpretation of Statutes, Section 35D, Board, Association, Section 35D, Government, Section 35D, Department, Department
DATE: 1961, 1961, 1961, 1961, 1961, year 1974-75, 30, 1973, 1978, March, 1961, year, April 1, 1976, 1983, 1982, 1983, 1961]2SCR189, 1923, March 31, 1970, the previous year, the previous year, 1956, 1 of 1956, today
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 6,03,410, 14,35,224, 3, 2, 3, 1985]152ITR308(SC, 1,39,163, 66,577, 1,000, 69,581, 111, 134, 69,581, 10,000, 69,581, 14,35,224, 19704,399(2, 1/10th, 1, 4, 3,22,558, 5, 76,947, 76,947, 2,45,611, 3,22,558, 76,947, 5, 3,57,799, 6, 6,03,410, 2, 6,03,410.8, 2, 1/10th, 6,03,410, 1, 2B, 10,000, 69,581, 134, 234, 1982]135ITR801(MP, 1984]147ITR52(MP, 1984]146ITR212(MP, 139, 832, 2, 1979]116ITR608(All, 533.11, 5, 6, 6,03,410, 264.13, 35D. Amortisation, one-tenth, 2, 1, 14, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3
PERSON: Jane, Miscellaneous, Gheru Lal Bal Chand, Nos, Shyam Lal Ramcharan, Lalu Bhai B. Patel & Co., Shri R. C. Mukati, Kunji Lal Dhanpat Rai, G. P. Singh, Nos, Anton furgens, G. P. Singh, Nos, Nos
PERCENT: 50%
MONEY: 21/2 per cent
ORDINAL: third, second
GPE: Ambatielos, India
NORP: Indian