Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ramchandra Rathore and Bros. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Decided On : Jul-15-1957

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 23, the Sales Tax Act, Section 2, the Indian Sale of Goods Act, Article 286 of the Constitution, Section 2, the Sales Tax Act, Section 2

ORG: ORDER1, the Board of Revenue, C.P., Berar Sales Tax Act, Bros, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, Cannon Brand, Cannon Brand, the Allahabad Bank, Bareilly, The Board of Revenue, Court, State, State, State, State, State, W.T. Lamb, Lords, the Board of Revenue

PERSON: Madhya Pradesh, Ramchandra Rathore, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Saugar, V.P. P.to, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Abdul Rashid v. State, and(3, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan

CARDINAL: 1, 3,39,949, one, 0, 50, fifty, 0, nine, thousand, 0-2, 1,000, 61, 1952, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1932, 1, One, one, 50

DATE: 1947, the year ending 31st December, 1949, 1st April, 1937, the end of every month, 60 days', 1930, the end of every month', the end of the month

GPE: Saugar, Saugar, U. P., L.J., Slesser, L.J.

NORP: Greer

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //