Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Ramchandra Rathore and Bros. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Decided On : Jul-15-1957
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Section 23, the Sales Tax Act, Section 2, the Indian Sale of Goods Act, Article 286 of the Constitution, Section 2, the Sales Tax Act, Section 2
ORG: ORDER1, the Board of Revenue, C.P., Berar Sales Tax Act, Bros, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, Cannon Brand, Cannon Brand, the Allahabad Bank, Bareilly, The Board of Revenue, Court, State, State, State, State, State, W.T. Lamb, Lords, the Board of Revenue
PERSON: Madhya Pradesh, Ramchandra Rathore, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Saugar, V.P. P.to, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Abdul Rashid v. State, and(3, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan, Kanhaiyalal Pradhan
CARDINAL: 1, 3,39,949, one, 0, 50, fifty, 0, nine, thousand, 0-2, 1,000, 61, 1952, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1932, 1, One, one, 50
DATE: 1947, the year ending 31st December, 1949, 1st April, 1937, the end of every month, 60 days', 1930, the end of every month', the end of the month
GPE: Saugar, Saugar, U. P., L.J., Slesser, L.J.
NORP: Greer