Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mamta Tiwari and ors.

Decided On : Jul-17-1987

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 256(1, Section 155(1, Section 273 of the Act, Section 155 of the Act, Section 273(b, Section 273(b, Section 143 or Section 144, Section 155, Section 273, Section 155 of the Act, Section 273 of the Act, Section 273, Section 155, Section 273 of the Act, Section 273, Section 273, Section 2(40, Section 143 or Section 144, Section 2(40, Section 155 of the Act, Section 143, Section 147, Section 273 of the Act (See Gates Foam & Rubber Company v., Section 147, Section 143, Section 148, Section 147, Section 147, Section 143 or Section 144, Section 215, Section 215, Section 147, Section 147, Section 273 of the Act, Section 147, Section 143, Section 155 of the Act, Section 143, Section 155, Section 155, Section 154, Section 154, Section 35(1, Section 35(1, Section 154, Section 155 of the 1961 Act, Section 155, Section 143 of the Act, Section 155, Section 143 of the Act, Section 144, Section 147 of the Act, Section 155 of the Act, Section 144, Section 147, Section 155, Section 143, Section 144, Section 147 of the Act, Section 143, Section 154, Section 155, Section 143 of the Act.8, Section 155, Section 153, Section 143, Section 155, Section 143 of the Act, Section 155, Section 155, Section 155, Section 153, Section 215(3, Section 154, Section 155, Section 215(3, Section 154, Section 155, Section 215(3, Section 154, Section 155, Section 215(3, Section 214, Section 215, Section 214, Section 80J, Section 154, Section 214, Section 215(3, Section 214, Section 215(3, Section 155, Section 155, Section 273 of the Act ', Section 155 of the Act, Section 143 or Section 144, Section 2(40, Section 140A, Section 141, Section 147, Section 155, Section 143(3, Section 155, Section 143 of the Act, Therefore, Section 2(40

PERSON: G.G. Sohani, Shri Mukati, S. Sankappa v., Ram Chandra Singh, Kamla Vativ, Ganeshram Nayak, D. Swarup, Pratap Singh, Jagjit Kaur, S. Sankappa's, Sankappa

NORP: J.1

DATE: 1961, years 1974-75 to 1976-77, 1968]68ITR760(SC, the assessment year', 1922, 1973, 1984, an assessment year, 1968]68ITR760(SC, 1922, 1922, 1968]68ITR760(SC, January 29, 1970, '11, the assessment year', the year 1971

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Tribunal, Appellate, Revenue, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, ITO, Shri Bagadiya, CIT, ITR, CIT, CIT, CIT, ITO, Gammon India Limited, CIT, CIT, the High Courts, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, Sections 215, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Legislature, CIT, Rajalakshmi Mills Limited, State, State, Tribunal

CARDINAL: 2, 144, 90, 482, 1976]104ITR77(Patna, 1983]141ITR841(Bom, 1980]126ITR540(All, 144, 6, 216, 217, 273, 144, 144, two, 155, 153, 155, 1980]125ITR141(Mad, 3, 145):'Thus, less than seventy-five

MONEY: 1981]129ITR43(Orissa, 1968]68ITR760(SC, 1968]68ITR760(SC, twelve per cent

GPE: Nabha, Sankappa, Sankappa

ORDINAL: first, first

EVENT: the 1922 Act

LOC: Act.12

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //