Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Collector of C. Ex. Vs. G.K. Auto Industries
Decided On : Jun-20-1989
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: Tariff Item 68, Rule 8, Tariff Item 68, Section 24(1, Tariff Item 68, Tariff Item 68, Tariff Item 68, Rule 13, Rule 12
CARDINAL: 1, 1601/88, 30, 1, 31, 10, 17-6-1977.2, 34, 30, one, 68, 1, ten, thirty, thirty, twenty-four, 10, 30, therein.10, 176/77, 30, 123, 30
ORG: Central Excise Tariff Item, Plant &, Machinery, Central Excise, Central Excise Tariff Item, the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals, Collector (Appeals, the Assistant Collector, the Collector (Appeals, us.4, SDR, Central Government, the Central Excises &, Collector, Advocate, Collector (Appeals, Central Excise Tariff Item, Collector (Appeals, SDR, The Appellant-Collector, SDR, BHAGWATI
DATE: the preceding financial year i.e., 1944, 1944, 1944, the first day of April, any financial year, the preceding financial year, a financial year, 1977-78, the 18th day of June, 1977, 31st day of March, 1978, the preceding financial year, the preceding financial year, para 5, the first day of April, any financial year, the preceding financial year, the 1st, the 1st, 1922, the preceding financial year, the 1st, 1944
GPE: Bombay, duty.15
PERSON: Shri V.M. Doiphode, Shri Ashok Tankala, Salt Act, Explanation I. - For, Shri K. Prakash, Shri Ashok Tankala, G.P. Singh, J.
ORDINAL: first, 1st, first, 4th, 1st, 1st
NORP: Central Excise, Indian