Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. G.K. Auto Industries

Decided On : Jun-20-1989

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Tariff Item 68, Rule 8, Tariff Item 68, Section 24(1, Tariff Item 68, Tariff Item 68, Tariff Item 68, Rule 13, Rule 12

CARDINAL: 1, 1601/88, 30, 1, 31, 10, 17-6-1977.2, 34, 30, one, 68, 1, ten, thirty, thirty, twenty-four, 10, 30, therein.10, 176/77, 30, 123, 30

ORG: Central Excise Tariff Item, Plant &, Machinery, Central Excise, Central Excise Tariff Item, the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals, Collector (Appeals, the Assistant Collector, the Collector (Appeals, us.4, SDR, Central Government, the Central Excises &, Collector, Advocate, Collector (Appeals, Central Excise Tariff Item, Collector (Appeals, SDR, The Appellant-Collector, SDR, BHAGWATI

DATE: the preceding financial year i.e., 1944, 1944, 1944, the first day of April, any financial year, the preceding financial year, a financial year, 1977-78, the 18th day of June, 1977, 31st day of March, 1978, the preceding financial year, the preceding financial year, para 5, the first day of April, any financial year, the preceding financial year, the 1st, the 1st, 1922, the preceding financial year, the 1st, 1944

GPE: Bombay, duty.15

PERSON: Shri V.M. Doiphode, Shri Ashok Tankala, Salt Act, Explanation I. - For, Shri K. Prakash, Shri Ashok Tankala, G.P. Singh, J.

ORDINAL: first, 1st, first, 4th, 1st, 1st

NORP: Central Excise, Indian

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //