Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Major Gopinathan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Decided On : Nov-20-1961

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 34, the Indian Penal Code, the Army Act, the Indian Penal Code, Section 34, the Indian Penal Code, Rule 5, the Army Act, Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Indian Penal Code, Section 69, the Army Act, Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Rule 5, Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 69, the Army Act, the Army Act, the Army Act', the Army Act, the Army Act, the Army Act, the Army Act, Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.7, the Army Act, the Army Act, Section 69, the Army Act, Section 125, Section 126, the Army Act, Section 549 of the Code of Criminal, the Army Act, Section 3 of Part II, Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Rule 5, Section 549 of the Code of CriminalProcedure, Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Indian Penal Code, Section 69, the Army Act, Section 69, the Army Act, the Army Act, the Army Act, Section 52 of the Act, the Army Act, Section 69, the Army Act and Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Army Act, the Army Act, Section 69, the Army Act, Section 69, the Army Act, Section 69'.13, Section 125, the Army Act and Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Army Act, the Army Act, Section 101, Section 102, Section 191, the Army Act, Rule 26, Rule 33, Rule 34, Rule 34, the Army Act, the Army Act, the Army Act, Section 69, the Army Act, the Army Act, the Army Act and Section 549of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Army Act and Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 69, the Army Act, the Army Act, Section 549, Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the, the Army Act, the Army Act, Rule 5, Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedurethe, Section 549 of the Code, Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 549

PERSON: Naik, Gopinathan, Gopinathan, Gopinathan, Gopinathan, Magistrate, Gopinathan, Gopinathan, Gopinathan, Gopinathan, Gopinathan, G. Barsay v. The State of, Rulesapplied, E.G. Barsay, G. Barsay's, G. Barsay's, Gopinathan, Gopinsthan

NORP: J.1, Rules

CARDINAL: 199, 1961.2, 30-8-1960,whereby, 352, 500, ten, 341, 342, 352, 500, 504, 147, 352, 500, 18-8-1960, 30-8-1960, 352, 500, two, 1, 48, four, 2, 3, 4, 125, 126, 2, 24-4-1951, 125, 126, two, 125, 126, 125, 126, 690, 709, 3, 3, 4, 1, 8), 9, 352, 500, 354, 354, 2, 24-8-19S1, 125, 126, 354, two, one, more than forty-eight hours, 24, 28, 32, 2, two, 1, two, 5, 1

ORG: Magistrate First Class, Shri Mahabir Prasad, Sections 342, Armed Forces, Magistrate, Shri Mahabir Prasad, Sections 34, the Court of the Magistrate, Magistrate, Sections 342, Magistrate, the Union Government under Section 549 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Magistrate, Magistrate, The First Additional Sessions, Court, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Sections 342, Magistrate, Magistrate, Army, AIR 1951, the Supreme Court, Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, Central Government, Court, Court, Central Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, the Court of Sessions (Rule 4, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the State Government, the Central Government, Magistrate, the Central Government, Magistrate, Magistrate, ArmyAct, Magistrate, Sections 342, Reliance, the Bombay High Court, State, the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, AIR 1961, the Supreme, Court, the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, Lordships, the Bombay High Court, the Interpretation of Section 69, Army, Chapter IX of, Army, Army, Army, Army, Criminal Court, Army, Criminal Court, Army, the Court of the Magistrate, Magistrate, Criminal Court, Criminal Court, Magistrate, the Central Government, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Criminal Court, Criminal Court, Magistrate, Criminal Court, Magistrate, the Central Government, Magistrate, the Court of the, Magistrate, Magistrate

GPE: Jabalpur, Jabalpur, Jabalpur, up.6, Bombay, Cri, India, India, New Delhi, them.12

DATE: 18-7-1960, 30-7-1960, 1950, 1950, 1958, April 1952, the 17th April 1952, seven days', the expiry of seven days, seven days, Rule 4, 1958, 1762, Rule 28

PRODUCT: Rule 4 of the Rules, Army Act

ORDINAL: first, first, second, third, first, first, 26th, first, Secondly, Thirdly, Fourthly, first, Fifthly, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //